Sky Box Office: Value for Money?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by roe, Nov 11, 2010.


  1. roe

    roe Guest

    In the last 3 years, Sky have shown the following 13 pay per view boxing events live on Sky Box Office:

    Hatton v Mayweather
    Hatton v Lazcano
    Khan v Prescott
    Hatton v Malignaggi
    de la Hoya v Pacquiao / Khan v ***an
    Khan v Barrera
    Hatton v Pacquiao
    Khan v Kotelnik
    Khan v Salita
    Haye v Valuev
    Haye v Ruiz
    Magnificent Seven
    Haye v Harrison

    Each of these shows has cost around £14.95. That's a total cost of this is £194.35 over the past 3 years, with the it being quite likely that there could be another sky pay per view show in December taking the total over £200.

    Personally I've bought 5 of these bills and in fairness, I can't really complain about them as I enjoyed all these main events.

    Anyway, just wondered how many of you have bought any of these and whether you feel they've been value for money?
     
  2. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    They're all value for money except Khan vs Prescott. I don't know why that was on PPV.
     
  3. happydrinks

    happydrinks directfraction.storenvy.com Full Member

    5,167
    0
    Sep 14, 2009
    Khan - Salita wasn't worth £1, let alone 15.

    Wasn't that the one where Sky decided they were out of time and had to close the show rather than show any undercard fights, even though the fight ended in the first round?
     
  4. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Chipped in for the Mayweather/Hatton fight. Well worth the money imho.

    Payed for the Hatton/Pacman fight. Stayed up 6 hours for 6 minutes. Say's it all really.

    Magnificent Seven was alright.
     
  5. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    Mayweather vs Hatton and Haye vs Valuev didn't have a single good fight on the card beside the main events.

    Mag 7 was great but no marquee names.
     
  6. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    haye valuev and haye harrison are free to air on satelite in germany picked up legal and free in the uk

    so is paying a monthly and a PPV tag good value for those you decide ?
     
  7. badlefthook84

    badlefthook84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,968
    2
    Apr 19, 2010
    I thought Hatton-Lazcano was absolutely terrible, the whole card. Watching Malignaggi trying to overcome his hair extensions dilemma was about as good as it got.
     
  8. badlefthook84

    badlefthook84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,968
    2
    Apr 19, 2010
    Question here and if any of ye can help. Why do the Germans prefer having fights on German terrestrial tv. They never do PPV. Is it a better business model or is it simply a case of the promoters in Britian primarily wanting to have the fights on terrestrial tv but the interest is not there so they have to go ppv. I seem to remember hearing that Froch-Pascal got 6-7 million viewers on ITV that night.
     
  9. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    Its because Germans are smart and cheap. They would never pay 14.95 quid for some bull**** fight. Never.

    Germans hate paying for anything. The only thing they spend money on is their big cars and loads of booze on their Italy/Spain vacations.
     
  10. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    6-7 million was not the actual number. was more like 4mil. Which is great viewers but viewers mean nothing. They want advertising sales.

    Advertisers in the UK wan't women. In Germany they still wan't men. its fair to say boxing is viewed mostly by lower classes, who therefore have a lower desposible income.
     
  11. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    but they still pay 50euros to watch Klitskcos jab people for an hour with no undercard???
     
  12. cheekyvid

    cheekyvid Detroit, I shall return. Full Member

    7,324
    3
    Nov 4, 2009
    efficient, dull and clinical, the germans love it
     
  13. leighton

    leighton Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,455
    0
    Jun 21, 2009
    The only fights I got in live were all the Haton fights and Haye's two World title fights. Sadly being out of work means that that extra £15 or €22 euro rules me out of it so I am left to watching the fights by different means.
    Skys prices are too much on top of the subs they charge a year. No PPV on Sky should be priced at that amount of money but with Sky , Promotors and fighters all wanting a huge slice of the PPV sales this is what we are paying extra for to all parties involved. IF they were to drop the prices they would get bigger numbers.
     
  14. bruthead

    bruthead REAL TALK Full Member

    2,308
    1
    May 3, 2009
    Looking at the list makes you realise how odd it is that they don't scale the prices. Hatton-Mayweather is the same price as Khan-Salita. Crazy.
     
  15. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009

    Hatton v Lazcano should not of been PPV material.

    de la Hoya v Pacquiao / Khan v ***an? that was a joke, Khan got signed a 4 fight deal, but got knocked out in his first fight, so because he still had that deal with Sky, and he needed easing back in after a devastating knockout, they put him in against a scrub, but they made sure it was on the same night as de la Hoya v Pacquiao so they could sell the PPV.