144.6 is b*******t...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by thechampizhere, Nov 12, 2010.


  1. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Idk, the greater the challenge in my opinion.
     
  2. Janjhalani

    Janjhalani Boxing Terrorist Full Member

    1,056
    0
    Aug 23, 2010
    Seriously Pac hating keep getting dumber, lower and crazy everyday.
     
  3. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    I wouldn't be surprised if champizhere pissed and **** in a bowl every morning and call it his breakfast.

    He didn't have any problems getting down to this weight. He started training 3 week earlier before Margarito. The man looks in fighting shape, NOT DRAINED. By fight night he's probably going to out weight Pacquiao by 13 to 20 lbs, and this is an advantage for Pacquiao, why??? :bbb:nono:hey
     
  4. TheBling

    TheBling Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    Waah waaah he moved up in weight so he's on PEDS waaah waaaaah he didn't put on weight so it's unfair


    SHUT THE **** UP
     
  5. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009

    How come all you tools always put 'real' 'truth' etc... when you ****s post regarding Pac?
     
  6. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    This thread is stupid even by the general standards.

    So Pacquiao weighing in miles under the limit is somehow further disadvantaging a career welterweight weighing in at 150.

    Brilliant logic.

    Margarito is going to out weigh Pacquaio by 15 pounds come fight time, and he shouldn't be weight drained considering he fought at 147 for most of his career and is probably well aware of the limits of his body in relation to draining. If anything this validates the fight entirely, its a great little man verse a good, relentless big man, a junior welterweight vs a junior middleweight.
     
  7. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    You clearly dont know the pro's and cons of the scenario huh?
     
  8. gyll

    gyll Undetectable Full Member

    5,882
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    To me it's a rule infraction. I don't have a problem with catchweight fights but they should be a separate category. I just don't think it sounds right to say a welterweight beat a light middleweight for a lmw belt OR vice versa. That's like saying a 4th grader passed 5th grade just by taking ONE test. There's a large amount of merit that's missing. But that's just me. If this is a new trend or a system change then I guess, say, Soto could weigh 135 lbs and fight/beat Pacquiao for a welterweight title. Multiple belts in general are bull****. I'm a firm believer that there should be just one belt for each class.

    As for Marg's illegal actions, it just means he's desperate for a payday. Nobody put a gun to his head to sign the contract for a catchweight fight. But c'mon...do you really think a desperate man would turn down a $6 million payday? Cotto, Marg, and I can just about assume Pac's other future opponents was/will be strong-armed into making a sacrifice because the money would be so lucrative. Good for the fighters, but bad for the fans.
     
  9. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
  10. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
  11. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    You seem to be confusing the bull**** associated with fighting in between two weight limits with small men beating bigger men for titles, which has always occurred throughout boxing history. If you can weigh-in under a division limit you are as deserving as anyone, being several pounds below the limit is a handicap, not an advantage, so its a moot point.
     
  12. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    This talk about Manny not being legit if wins because he is UNDER the weight limit is stupid. Boxing has never, ever, ever kept a fighter from winning a title because he was BELOW weight. If a ****ing flyweight can knock Wlad Klit out he is the HW champ, period, and more power to him. It boggles the mind how ignorant some people are about a sport which is fairly simple to comprehend...
     
  13. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    So for you, Soto beating Pac for the welterweight belt weighing 147 would be more of an accomplishment than if he were to beat him at welterweight weighing 135? You live in the bizarro world

    The only problem should be against Margo fighting for a vacant jr middle title against a guy weighing 144.
     
  14. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    Oh and to the dumbass who said: "That's like saying a 4th grader passed 5th grade just by taking ONE test."

    You can actually do that. Its called an aptitude test. You wouldnt know that because you obviously lack the intelligence to be able to spell aptitude but in college I passed several courses by simply walking into an office, passing the aptitude test, and never attended a single day of class for that course. If a WW can beat a bigger stronger guy for his title what difference does it matter that he didnt weigh OVER 147?
     
  15. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    Ah, so basically, let's say a welterweight vs a middleweight fight is an autowin for the welterweight fighter because he is lighter? Now, i get it! Thanks.