Pacquiao "light midle weight" champion

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by supremo, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    61,460
    Likes Received:
    42
    Bang on. David Hayes career at heavyweight should be judged in a similar fashion IMHO.
     
  2. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    8,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    How do you mean Gaz, not sure I really get the comparison
     
  3. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    30,096
    Likes Received:
    1
    coz haye gives away so much weight
     
  4. Broxi

    Broxi Stand With Ukraine Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    5,431
    Likes Received:
    312
    ...
     
  5. mRD

    mRD vagabond Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's the big freaking deal with these belts anyways? people just want to see great fights...speed vs size...power vs. skills and all that good stuff. If pac (just pure if) somehow beats the Klits bros at heavyweight div, wouldn't you call him the heavyweight champ of the world?
     
  6. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Messages:
    45,002
    Likes Received:
    4
    Neither of these should have been near a 154lb title anyway, especially matched together. That preceeded the weight issue.

    Who cares though...titles are almost an irrelevance where Pac is concerned now he´s won so many.
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    61,460
    Likes Received:
    42
    As a Crusierweight who's moved up to heavy and beat some top 10 contenders rather than a 2 weight world champ.
     
  8. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,152
    Likes Received:
    1
    "a great achievement" is an understatement.

    He's the best fighter I have ever seen. He battered a much bigger, stronger fighter who many have avoided. He has also proved myself and many others wrong on a number of occasions when he has stepped up another level and made it look so easy. Enjoy him now, you won't see another flyweight do what he has done ever again.

    A legend of a fighter.
     
  9. David the

    David the Fat Bastard Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Catchweights,titles today dont really matter , what did matter was we had the chance to see a legend in the making at or near his prime,enjoy him while he fights,I certainly did,boxers like him come along once in a generation.lm not his greatest fan(Larry Holmes was better:deal) but I think I know and can appreciate greatness when I see it........
     
  10. John18

    John18 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,490
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hate the catchweights as well. If Pac wants to weigh in halfway through a weightclass, then so be it. But the opponent should be able to come at the usual limits.

    Everyone who is praising him for beating bigger opposition, how he is willing to trade, to go for the win every time should ask themselves why they insist on the catchweights? He must be gaining some advantage from it, otherwise he wouldn't want them.

    Just another angle on the situation.
     
  11. badlefthook84

    badlefthook84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,968
    Likes Received:
    2
    I am sick of listening to **** from people like you who despite witnessing an all time great batter a man so much bigger than him, continue to find fault about something. Most of Ray Leonard's important fights were fought at a catchweight so where is your thread on him. Seriously, it gets boring after a while.