Rob vs Buncey, who was right?

I was going to post the exact same thing in the Pac-Margo thread.

 

Seeing as Fitz was about 168 for the one fight of him we can see (except the closing moments of the Lang fight, which I will also use to identify some important aspects of the matchup) I was gonna say super middle.

Would not wanna debate Fitz-Conteh Would blow my mind!

I also think it will be interesting: Calzaghe can polarise opinions, but the 'modern is better' crowd would no doubt defend his ultra modern training techniques like, um, running up hills.

Anyways I'll save this for the thread, bear with me :good

 

As much as I like Bunce I'm with Rob here. I think his reply to Bunce was spot on.

If Haye ends up fighting Harrison he will lost massive respect from those who know their boxing no doubt about it, and especially after all his mouthing off to the Klitscho brothers in the past. Just get the fight on FFS.

 

It has to be said that Buncey's cheer leading of the Haye vs Audley fight hasn't been the best.

 

It has to be said, Rob was right.

 

rob was correct!

 

Rob is the man!

 

Another thing is, is that not only was/is Audley never any good in the pro game, the guy is more or less 40 and shot.

It's all very well saying well HW's in the past took on weak opponents, but these guys were banging them out weekly, before facing top draw opponents.

 

Couldn't be arsed to read the whole thread, but did Bunce reply? If not then SHAME ON YOU Bunce cos I know you ****ing read it. I would have if it had pointed me out.

 

:-( **** you Bunce. You just lost a friendly and take a look at yourself because you DO NOT represent boxing.

 

looks like bunce may have his hands full this thursday on the boxing hour? lookin forward to it!

 

Remember that the email for Thursday is

This content is protected

and the number is 0207 224 2000.


Adios.