Pacquiao Easily DESTROYS All But ONE Slick African American Boxer...!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BenjaminLinus, Nov 20, 2010.


  1. Bald_Head_Chick,

    Is that you, Senior? Because you two say the dumbest **** and contradict yourself in the process. :hi:

    Pac's destroying all these guys because he's on PEDs. At the same time, Pac's only fighting shot, old, paid-to-lose, weight-drained fighters with zero chances of winning to begin with. :patsch

    For ****'s sake, choose ONE so you stop lookin' like a dumb ****. :vonnecunt
     
  2. Pac takes and passes drug tests just fine. He's just not taking Floyd's tests, which is a desperate attempt at a psychological advantage and nothing more.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  3. dvb

    dvb Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,826
    1
    Mar 16, 2010
    true true,floyd or mosley are his options,doesnt seem like marquez will agree to terms to make the 3rd fight.

    i think if no floyd match,then 2nd choice is marquez and 3rd is mosley.

    those 3 are the only worthwile options tbh. after them theres no one worth fighting,no one good enough,no one popular enough.

    williams and martinez just seem too damn big for pac,and there obvs. no bums either!.

    think we should all not hate on pac or floyd as fighters,and appreciate being lucky to witness such great boxers in our lifetime.

    now issues with them personally is fair enough,and obvious blatent faults is all fine to comment on too,but u have to appreciate thier skills no matter what.

    your losing out if you disklike either guy as a fighter
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Mosley = #1 welterweight and #3 p4p
    Marquez = #1 lightweight and #2p4p
    Hatton = #1 lightwelterweight and top 10 p4p
    Oscar = #1 light middleweight
    Baldomir = WBC and Ring welterweight champion

    When I look at that, that confirms to me that Floyd is shitting on Manny
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    No doubt about it. Big difference in class. I think Berto dodged a bullet not having to fight Mosley as well (albeit the circumstances are understandable).
     
  6. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    How where is the contradiction? Maybe Pac likes "double coverage"?

    Nobody in their right mind says "Pac is definitely on PED's". I am just kidding being purposely abrasive when I do so. However it is strange he won't drug test. It is even stranger given his inability to KO JMM and break Margo's iron face.

    He is ALSO fighting declining top names and/or weight drained fighters. Show me the opponent that wasn't coming off a SPECTACULAR loss or forced into a catch weight? You can't.

    Just because both anomalies exist it doesn't rule out one or the other. He may be selling his crap and buying insurance on the deal. Wouldn't be the first time. Check out Goldman Sachs.

    Intelligent people always look "dumb" to the people who can't understand anything they are talking about. :lol:
     
  7. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    they asked bradley to spar with pac when they were setting up the mayweather fight (just as floyd talked to zab about sparring for pac) - but bradley said he didnt want to give pac a look at him in case they fought. i dont think bradley has the seasoning yet to go into deep waters with pacquiao. pac , when he has you hurt - wont let you off the hook- although his compassion for margarito contradicted that i guess.

    i think its a good fight- pac wins easily, but it does alot for his cred- and shuts up alot of the doubters who think he woudlnt be dominant against a black fighter , because of styles. i also think its a great prep for pac if he cant fight floyd right away - and in the interim- allows him to show his style against a slick , quick counter puncher.

    if pac dominates bradley- i see floyd being less than enthusaistic for that fight. i think in his mind- he s counting on his boxing skills being the difference- i think he sees pac as being crude, but hte truth is, pac has become a tremendously creative and skillful boxer, to see him throw a right hook, then straight up left, or a left hook from the back foot, then a up jab with his right- were combinations that you dont see very often at all.

    if you think about floyds most competitve fights, they were against, corley, zab and augustus, especially augustus- who was a creative, awkward, unpredictable southpaw. granted, it was before floyd developed and got better, but by the same token , pac has improved tremendouosly..

    i remember the first time i saw pac against morales- it was, and he was such a basic fighter, he could punch, but all he threw was a jab jab straight over and over. to see how he s absorbed the coaching roach has tought him is impressive.
     
  8. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    in regards to peds, anyone that knows about these drugs, or has taken them or trained with people who have taken them, would know that putting on pure muscle, without any compromise in speed , is easy- and putting on the weight is almost elementary. my best mate, and sparring partner , put on 15 pounds pure muscle in 3 months, and was faster and stronger. its why sprinters take them- they get bigger and faster.

    what im getting at , is , if pac were on the ****- wouldnt he maximise it and get his weght up to 150 - so he could take advantage of said muscle gains?!?! if anything , he struggles hard to put on weight - he came in 6 pounds under....

    its not pacs muscles that have won him these fights, it s his skills.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    He just REFUSES to take any tests to confirm said theory. :roll:

    (Though I disagree, great reasoned analysis otherwise. :good)
     
  10. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    It will go down on paper as Manny being the first to stop Shane Mosley but does that really enhance Manny's legacy? At this stage in his life Mosley should not be fighting anyone with an offensive like Manny. I don't blame Manny if he ends up taking the fight, Shane still puts himself out there in his willingness to take these fights against guys he shouldn't of. However stopping a man who has gone 2-2-1 in his last five fights and has been showing decline since 2003 (can argue 2002) surely doesn't enchance Manny's legacy? Camacho stopping Leonard and Joppy stopping Duran do not enhance the legacies of Camacho and Joppy do they?

    I'll put this to you as a boxing fan, not a Manny Pacquiao fan. Do you honestly want to see Shane Mosley at the age of 39, having been in the ring with bigger punchers than Manny and not stopped, to be stopped at this point in his career against a man who is clearly clearly superior to him at the moment?
     
  11. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    pac beats every one 147-140 apart from mayweather
     
  12. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Especially after catch weights. :thumbsup

    :roll:
     
  13. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    Only if he wants to have mosley a short life.