lets see, he almost knocked out rampage..he almost choked him out,,almost got the armbar on rampage..and yet rampage wins??,,rampage only landed a few shots..nothing hurt michida but michida hurt him..pure bull$hit.
all of the happened in round 3, the other two rounds were close to call. i think you could make a case for both rampage and machida. hardly a robbery.
All of that happened in the third round. Unfortunately, Machida didn't win the first two rounds convincingly so that's why he lost.
Wasn't Pride rules. With how UFC scores their fights, you don't deserve to win just because you completely controlled the last round, with the first being close and the second being enough for the other man to take.
It was close, but I would have called it a draw. Machida ran like an Olympian in the first, Rampage won the second, and Machida won the third. He didn't almost knock him out, though or tap him out, though. That's a clear biased exageration.
:good Instead of whining, people should give Rampage massive props. Hardly anyone gave him a chance of winning this, but win it he did
i thought it should have been a draw but when i started to feel bad i thought of this. i had it 10-10 first round(they should both LOSE this round for the lack of activity lol), and 1 round a piece for machida and rampage.
word. it should've been a draw at least. i guess giving the fight to quentin and the talks about an immediate rematch might spark a flame for the fighters to be more aggressive. even thoe rampage won, he wasn't happy with the result, similar how he won against ninja in pride. Either way if they fight again, I wont be paying for it. Rampage is no longer the same fighter and Machida is just plain boring.
