This is why Pacquiao is a much better fighter than Morales ever was.

I'm not following what's happening here.

I thought i just have to read it again, which i did. I understand it, but doesn't get what's the TS fuss about?

What triggered him to feel insecure and discredit Morales to uplift Pac?

 

The one argument I have is, when Morales went to war with Chi and McCullough, did he have the speed advantage that Pacquiao held over both Cotto and Margarito?...which was a major factor in both bouts.

 

i didnt think there was any debate who was better? pretty obvious choice for pac

 

Morales beat Pacquiao, quite easily, when he was pretty shot. Morales was finished, even when he beat Manny. When he was losing, he was getting beat up by David Diaz and guys like that.

No way Manny would have ever beaten Morales if he'd fought him 3-4 years earlier

 

I'm sure Morales would have used HGH and moved up, if it was about when he was in his prime

 

nah, xylocaine is better for him to protect his brittle hands as was demonstrated by a former p4p king who is on vacation right now.

 

Just cause he beat the utter **** out of your hero doesnt mean he's better than Morales

 

You think Judah should be ranked at around the same place Morales is in an all time list.

Your're nothing but a troll.

 

Morales is a legend and ATG who only ever lost to great fighters minus Raheem in a boring decision at 135.

Yeah Pac is going to be ranked higher as an ATG but why **** on morales. Pac has faced much bigger guys who wouldnt dare fight Pac for 2 minutes southpaw just to put on a show.