John Murray -V- Willie Limond : A Great Fight!

I was liking what I saw from Limond in the Morales fight.

I really wanted him to pull the win. He really had a proper game-plan in for this fight. He was circling, boxing well, avoiding punches, and after 3 it just seem to have slipped.

Murray would beat him at this stage.

Always felt bad for Limond. He never got that big win on his record.

 

why hes only 31 give a rematch with alex aruthur both need a good bounce back win to get in the mix again???:|

 

limond would be easily beaten by both alex arthur and lee mcallister. a couple of good rounds against a well past it morales don't mean ****.

 

easily beaten my arse!!!
mcallister only been in with murray,apart from fighting unkown africans every 3 months 4 the CW title.ok aruthur beat limond 7 years ago , but a think it would be a whole diffirent outcome if the fought again!!!limonds alot beta fighter than people think and know that really bugs him most is the arthur defeat!!

 

esb has went down the drain the past couple of years, i've always come on these pages read through c wots happening on the british scene... what annoys me most is folk talking s*** rob palmer immediately springs to mind. i know willie very well he was offered £10,000 to fight mitchell then upto 12. that seems like a lot but when you spread that over the 8 weeks training not earning, -10% trainer 15-20% manager 4% board your not left with much, we dont live up in the hills no more! I could go on all day. willie has always been a clean living dedicated pro and i would give him a good chance with the best in europe, murray included who i rate and enjoy watching.

 

i am rob palmer. if he was confident of beating Mitchell he should of taken the risk. Did he get paid 12k for any of his WBU title fights???

 

yes he did mate dont you think you talk out of your backside alot? what do you have against limond anyways?

 

how do i no your not talking out of your backside. who are you?

i don't rate him as a fighter. thinks the world owes him a favour. lives of a fight he lost to a prospect. has never beat anyone decent. has a boring style.

also he is scottish. and i don't like scotland or scottish people.

 

If you hate Scottish people(or are you being facetious..?) why have you tken the username made famous by a famous Scottish footballer/hardman?

As for talking out of ones backside, pot, kettle black

 

have you been let out for the day? your comments are stupid, you dont know much about boxing in general.. just you concentrate on your rankings.

 

Also... Never beaten anyone decent? Bullhl****
- Choi
- ramagoadi(sp) is certainly 'decent', after all he's beaten jamie Arthur, wale and Derry
- kevin o hara is decent

I agree he doesn't deserve a Brit title shot yet but certainly an eliminator although he'd have no chance against Murray. Put him in with mcallister, that's a decent matchup IMO

 

Murray in a tough fight, I just think his workrate will swing rounds in his favour even if he misses a large percentage of punches. To avoid looking utterly foolish at points though, he MUST improve his footwork as Limond is one crafty dude.

 

The only Murray Limond has a chance of fighting is Andy Murray saying that I feel Andy would out box Limond and win wide on the cards. As for a fight with John Murray he doesnt deserve to fight Murray and John really should be stepping up to the next level by now.
Also John Murray beats Andy Murray it would be a decent scrap between the both but I feel John would come on a lot stronger in the final few rounds and might force a stoppage late on.

 

again who are you and what do you know about boxing?