Manny Pacquiao: The most overated fighter in the history of boxing??

TOO FUNNY! Dude starts off with a bang by stating he's gonna make an "arguement".

Maybe if you made and "argument" the rest of us may give you a shred of credibility.

 

Second of all.

It's all in your dream unless proven so it's all would of could of BS. :rofl

 

He's not the most overrated but he certainly is ovverated by a lot of people
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=270223

 

Me too.

That was Barrera at his best.

He was more mature, concensus #2 P4P, beating the crap out of everybody before and several fights after the Pac fight.

 

Actually it is Julio Cesar Chavez, closely followed by Rocky Marciano and Joe Frazier.

 

To the TS...if you really believe that, you should really start watching boxing...you just might like it.

 

135-147, only floyd and JMM will give pac problems, others will be same outcome...after pac destroys them, they will be shot, weight drained, bums...thats just how it is with pac....deal:deal

and oh, if you think pac is overrated, give me an active fighter who has better resume than pac....otherwise STFU dumb****!!!:hey:smooch

 

there u f*cken go typical pacfan..

u pacfans need a goddamn lesson in maturity..

 

Like you need a lesson in how to spell argument?

 

yes..

like how i need a lesson to spell arguement

 

atsch

 

http://oxforddictionaries.com/nores...earchUri=All&sort=alpha&type=dictionarysearch



No exact results found for "arguement" in the dictionary.
Did you mean argument?

Did you mean arguments?

Did you mean augment?

Did you mean argent?

Did you mean argemone?

 

Wow...you pretty much stuck it in your own ass with that one...no **** or anything, just stuck it up there all on ur own...

 

Not most overrated in history but overrated all the same

Smart matchmaking at right times and facing a lot of fighters at the right times has led to that.

Still a great fighter just with question marks over his head.

 

:rofl