The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Cool story, bro.
     
  2. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,414
    329
    Jul 21, 2007
    damn... ask him for advice ...I'm lookin for the juice..
     
  3. Karceno

    Karceno Guest

    i could have told you that and you didnt have to go to the beach
     
  4. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    solid source, thanks for a new ESB definition :rofl
    along with the favorites like floored, etc
     
  5. Jack Kollin

    Jack Kollin Say my name? Full Member

    1,786
    0
    Oct 22, 2010
    :lol:
     
  6. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    It can be done without drugs.Lots of fighters have moved up several weight classes over the years.Besides Pac is usually at a catch weight.I honestly think that with the amount of fighters who are accused of using drugs one would have been caught out by now.
     
  7. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    Name me fighters that have won titles in over 3 weight divisions and carried the workrate Pacquiao does?

    I've been a fan for 30 years, and every fighter top notch fighter I've seen climb divisions relied more and more on skill with each weight jump.......

    Everyone of those fighters dropped their workrate and took rounds off as they moved up.
    Instead Pacquiao taking rounds off, the bigger fighters he outweighs are having to slow down and take those rounds off.:lol:

    Pacquiao has now won titles in 8 weight classes and his quickness, speed, power and workrate have not slowed.

    Its never been done the way Pacquiao is doing it, which is why people are very skeptical that he's using PED's.

    .......these reasons alone are reason enough to be skeptical of Pacquiao, but when he did this.......
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZr6MZDBPZI&feature=player_embedded[/ame]#!
    .....that was enough to convince me without a shadow of a doubt!


    .......as for the poor *******s that are in denial????
    We can have situation where Pacquiao tests postive for PED's and these poor *******s will swear Pacquiao was framed!:nut

    Unless Pacquiao were to come public and admit through his own words he's a cheat, the *******s will never believe it.
    *******s live by the word of Pacquiao!:lol:
     
  8. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    :patsch


    Hey Flexb, Karceno's a "CRACKHEAD", too. Just like Floyd Mayweather Sr., so that obviously seals the deal... :rofl:lol::rofl:hammertime:bananamaniac:dance
     
  9. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    His one shot power is clearly relatively less now that when he was at lower weights imo. Of course his quickness is relatively more against bigger men. Umm, that's perfectly normal.

    And you'll need to explain why a guy weighing in at at 144 - 145 lbs and coming to the ring about the same wieght would not be expected to have a better workrate than the same guy weighing in at 129-130lbs and coming to the ring at 144-145lbs. You're not too thick to work that out are you?
     
  10. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Edit - I realise other people have beat me too this, but **** it

    He hasn't spud. That's wrong - That's a myth, and it's part of the reason you're making these baseless accusations. For the last 5 years he has been cutting weight and then rehydratig on fight night.

    Explain how he has gained 20lbs in two years:

    This content is protected


    This content is protected



    November 2006 (FOUR years ago). Pacquiao's fight night weigh is 144.

    This content is protected


    You make a stupid claim that he's gained 20lbs in two years, when in fact the truth is he's put on 2-3lbs in about 4 years. This is proof that you're actually just making stuff up and don't know what you're talking about.

    Anything to say about this
     
  11. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    You're not entering into the equation that the Pacquiao fighting at 130 lbs was punching at fighters around his size........

    One of the major reasons why a fighters workrate diminishes is that he has to punch at and deal with the pressure of a much bigger mass coming at him.

    Lightheavyweight champ Billy Conn was boxing the pants off of Joe Louis but because Louis was so much bigger, Conn tired and got stopped.

    You look at a modern day fighter like Mayweather Jr., his workrate was much better at 130 lbs and 135 lbs.......past those weights his workrate has significantly dropped when he fought naturally bigger fighters....

    I could go on and on, fighters like Duran, Leonard, Hearns.....they all had to pick their spots and take rounds off as they climbed weight classes.......thats just been the nature of the sport until Pacquiao arrived at the scene and defied the laws of physiology.......

    Let me see, who else has defied the laws of Physiology.......hmmmmm, Mark McGuire, Sammy Sosa, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens.......
    Hmmmm.......I wonder why?:think
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    this is a total ownage but spud will come back as if this never happened.
     
  13. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    The only reason anyone is skeptical is because of the mad delusions of a crackhead from a family of scum.

    That is the fact. That is where it all came from.

    Once people decided to buy into these ******ed delusions, the rationalisations began.
     
  14. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,363
    300
    Dec 29, 2006
    What a good source and a good article
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    will read back later if i needed some laugh. thread bookmarked.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.