A current Gentro-Computer broke down a (1979 version) of Larry Holmes versus a (1964 version) of Cassius Clay. Holmes won a decision 7-6-2.
tommygun, Yes, I would agree that Clay/Ali was at his best 65' thru 67'. But that list of opponents during that time sure doesn't scare anyone. No faded Eddie Machen, no under-rated Amos Lincoln, no young and fast Leotis Martin, no capable Thad Spencer. Both Joe Frazier and Jerry Quarry were too young. Damn, even a 1967 Buster Mathis would be "tops' on that list.
So you don't rate him #1 Peak H2H at Heavyweight, then bodhi? I think Peak Ali ('65 Patterson - '67 Folley) should be favoured against all other Peak Greats.
I don´t think there is a clear #1 h2h hw. And I think the 60s Ali is more beatable than the ealry 70s Ali. And yeah, I know I´m very much alone with that. But 60s Ali didn´t show many things that the 70s Ali showed to have.
Before the Liston fights, Ali didn't like no 'world beater'. Look at that Henry Cooper fight. About 20-seconds before Ol' Enry dropped Mister Sweet Pants, Henry landed a right hand which had Cassius Clay dancing along the ropes. Clay then tried to dance and ran out of room, before 'Kaboom'.
Then Ali proceeded to stop him on cuts and outclass him in the rematch. Anyone can get a lucky shot in
Ali of the 60's was an unbeatable fighter. He did not have to show in the 60's what he showed in the 70's because he was so much more dominant in the 60's.
Henry Cooper was no 'super fighter'. He was a decent fighter yes, but not one of the top echelon fighters. Plus, Clay did not drop him, he cut him. A year and half earlier, when Cooper was 27 years old, and a better fighter, Zora Folley nearly killed him. Zora flat out knocked-out Cooper in a minute of the 2nd round. Henry Cooper was a 6' 2" 185 lb. fighter. Smaller than Leon Spinks.
What's your point ? Ali was very green at that point, yet he still had the composure to recuperate and win the fight. Then a few years later he went on to stop him AGAIN. Why don't we talk about Holmes getting floored by guys like Snipes and Shavers?
Ali really didn't a top class challenger around from 65-67...when he was trying to get in as many fights as he could before his legal problems hit.. Old and undersized 50's fighters, or B+ sixties fighters. Ernie Terrell may have been the best of the lot...and Ernie would have lasted less the 6 rounds against prime Foreman or Frazier.
Ernie Terrell was the best 'jab and clutch' of his era. In Ali's his first '8' defenses he was by far the best of the mediocre lot. Following his 15 round torture-fest with Ali (no knockdowns), he got beat-up pretty good by Thad Spencer (who floored Big Ernie twice). Something Ali could not do.
I think thats an accurate assessment. I'd take 66-67 Ali to reverse that outcome without batting an eyelash. I'd put money on it too.