Are you insane? I am asking you to refute my post...and you've gone ot of your way to NOT DO IT. atsch That's the most obivous thing here. You cannot refute my post....
NICe one drew! I may not agree 100% with all this, but at least you are putting some serious effort. :thumbsup
Well thought out.. I just figure theres no point in making a case when people like Lance are just going to come up with a different point of view that is biased whether he will admit that its biased or not.
No point to me in putting in "serious effort" when the guy your argueing with has an egotiscial selfish viewpoint and is disrespectful with name calling.
Shane is easily the best WW on his resume, even at 39! A younger Shane would have KO'd Floyd in the 3rd round.
The same Shane that got out boxed by Oscar and almost killed by Vernon. Winky imposed his size on Shane so I'll leave that alone. It would be a close fight though, but I'd favor Floyd
this is a very logical thread. his facts are true. if youre gonna argue against it, please use facts, not bias opinions. if u resort to using opinions or name callin, etc... it only shows his argument 2 b credible.
Thank you Sal. Still blows my mind how Floyd fans attack ppl on this forum if they try to argue anything regarding Mayweather. I have always stated I am a boxing fan first and probably share many of the same fighters as a fan as Floyd fans. I respect the Floyd fans here and do admit to enjoy Floyd at his best you have to really appreciate the sport beyond knockout fighters. With that said to disclaim Manny as an ATG is a tragedy. I want to enjoy all the time he is around in this game becaise he is a just a class act in every sense of the word.
Younger Floyd was much moar offensive and had a higher frequency with the jab. He wouldn't have had all the criticism about being safety first either, meaning he would not have stood right in front of Shane like he did. Mosley gets whooped worse than he did if they were younger.