YEAH I SAID IT! MFC Owner/President Mark Pavelich

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by monaroCountry, Nov 30, 2010.


  1. http://mmamail.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=337#p337

    I am disgusted by the way MMA clothing brands are buckling to “DW’s” handling of contracts regarding the sponsorship of specific fighters.


    It’s almost comical – not on his part but on the part of these clothing companies. They cave in and pay his organization a great deal of money just to have the opportunity to sponsor fighters, who they then pay an individual fee to as well. What these clothing brands fail to understand is that the entire organization that “DW” runs is sponsored by a competing clothing company.


    These other brands are paying to represent themselves, yet they will never get the brand recognition they are seeking since the company itself has what would be considered a title sponsorship with another clothing brand – probably the most-recognizable brand in the industry. You are competing in an uphill battle that you can never win.


    Now “DW” has instructed these other clothing brands that they have to stop sponsoring other MMA events or they will not be allowed to sponsor fighters in his event – even after fully paying him for the right to sponsor and paying the fighters individually. He is collecting money by the armored truck full from these companies, and yet he’s still able to tell them where to spend the rest of their money at the same time. Has he or anyone in his company ever heard of something called “restraint of trade?”


    In a million years, you would never get away with this is other sports. I would like to see Nike, Adidas, or Reebok be told how and where they can spend their sponsorship dollars. It would never happen.


    Maybe it’s time the Maximum Fighting Championship stopped helping MMA clothing brands build their business, and for these businesses to be bullied into these types of situations, caving in, and walking away from what helped them get launched in the first place. These companies are compromising their long-term futures and don’t even realize it.


    Right now they are not even running their own companies.


    “DW” is running his show … and yours.


    This content is protected
     
  2. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    "Restraint of trade" :lol: seriously Mark?

    Clothing companies are willing to do it because sponsoring fighters in MFC is not going to actually accomplish anything.

    Nike, Adidas, etc wouldn't do it because they do more than screen print shitty t-shirts.
     
  3. moreorless

    moreorless Active Member Full Member

    1,346
    0
    Sep 19, 2010
    The size of the companies isnt really the issue so much as the legality of the UFC demanding they stop sponsoring fighters elsewhere.
     
  4. PIRA

    PIRA Arise Sir Lennox. Full Member

    5,426
    882
    Mar 30, 2007
    Won't fly in Australia - its called restriction of trade.
     

  5. Beebs we all know how much you love hanging on Zuffa's nut sacks but for once let it go and think about the health and state of the sport and fighters all over the world if Zuffa had its way.
     
  6. pretty much true for most countries.
     
  7. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    It is perfectly legal, it is called mutual consent. T-shirt company doesn't like it, they don't have to sign the contract.

    There is no constitutional right of sponsorship. :lol:
     
  8. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    It's a simple issue of free enterprise; nobody is forcing anybody to do anything here.
     
  9. moreorless

    moreorless Active Member Full Member

    1,346
    0
    Sep 19, 2010
    A dominant business in a field looking to use its near monopoly in that fashion could as has been commented on be challenaged for restraint of trade, both by the shirt companies and fighters outside the UFC who lose sponsorship.

    As with many other Zuffa pratices though I'd guess its a case of nobody being willing to mount a costly challange.

    No it isnt, I'm no expert so I can't say how much of a case anyone would have but it is clear that such busienss pratices shirt close to illegality.
     

  10. Right, so look at what happened with TapOut and Fedor deal recently? UFC THREATENED to ban TapOut if they sponsored Fedor and FORCED THEM to cancel their proposed million dollar deal with Fedor. I can understand it if they blocked sponsorship to another promotion but not for a fighter.
     
  11. exactly
     
  12. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Im shocked that it took 10 posts for Morono to bring up the ''f'' word. But it is a valid point.
     
  13. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    They aren't blocking them, Tapout is free to sponsor whoever, wherever, whenever they ****ing want, and they can tell the UFC to go **** themselves in return.

    The UFC, however, has the right to say "no, you can't get publicity on our shows"

    Basic rules of free exchange people.
     
  14. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    I don't know what you mean by "could as has been" if you mean "could have been" then yes, they could be challenged on it, but they (Zuffa) would win, every time. Every. Single. Time.

    You think Bud Light or Harley doesn't have the money to challenge Zuffa?

    They do, they just happen to have at least one person in the corporation who has read the first chapter of a business law book working for them.
     
  15. TapOut is really not free to sponsor anyone without loosing their existing contract with the UFC. If their contract was severed im sure that there would be financial and or legal consequences. It’s a bit like the NASCAR telling Red Bull that they could either sponsor NASCAR or sponsor Formula One (never both). This isn’t freedom in any way or form.

    Why shouldn’t a business be able to sponsor a fighter?

    NASCAR – RED BULL
    This content is protected


    FORMULA 1 - RED BULL
    This content is protected