Prime Lewis TKO Vitali in how many rounds??

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

See, thats where you're wrong nuthugger, Vitali LOST fair & square to a **** version of Lewis, BTW I'm not a lewis hugger, I think he came to the top at just the right time, as peak versions of Holyfield and Tyson would've kicked his ass.

 

The injuries were to his knees. If I remember correctly he re-injured one of them in prep for Rahman. He tried to fight with a brace on it but it wasn't working for him. It's well documented, go check it out.

I never once claimed that Lewis' win wasn't legit. It was cuts caused by punches, a TKO ref stoppage to be exact.

The only proven steriod use was leading up to the Olympics, back in his am days. I believe he used the same excuse as Toney did, saying it was to speed the repair of an injury. You already knew that though, you just can't handle it. Where's you outrage at Mosley? RJJ or James Toney? JT was caught TWICE as a pro LATE in his career. Vitali doesn't even have the muscle mass usually associated with being a steriod user. Wlad has never tested positive-period.

 

Why don't you show what really happened?

let me guess, this happened by luck.

 

Yup, and he took every single one of those punches AND KEPT MOVING FORWARD THROWING BOMBS.


Now what does that tell you?

Owned.:good

 

I think Wlad would catch Grant earlier, like he did with Austin (KO2). Grant has a weak chin and Wladimir would hit him early & often.

 

Rahman did not need "ten more seconds" to KTFO Lewis.
McCall did neither.:hi:

 

What the **** is your problem? How many times do I need to put you straight with bull****? I've already told you 3 times before since you post the same bull**** over and over and over.

Now I'm going to tell you again, infact I'm going to shout since you obviously can't hear, try to get it into that thick skull of yours.

LEWIS TRIED TO REMATCH TYSON BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI.
HE TRIED TO SUE TYSON AND KING BEFORE VITALI.
IT WAS REPORTED ON THE 11 MAY 2003, BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI.
BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI
BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI
BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI
BEFORE HE FOUGHT VITALI

This sinking in yet?

 

Just a difference of opinion RUSKULL, no worries, all guess work anyways.:good

 

Lewis would win a pretty east UD

 

It's not bull**** at all because I responding to someone who said Vitali won because Lewis accidently cut him. Go back and read the posts. Othewise I don't really have a lot of disagreement with your reply.

 

Yes, that's precisely the reason why people say it. Unmotivated explains also why Lewis retired. I think he was at a career high in weight, as well. Not shot, no.

 

Brilliant response.

 

An excuss for everything..you best look in the mirror..or better yet on boxrec and see who actually won this (Vitali-Lewis) fight. Once again, you appear very confused as to the actual outcome of it.

And as for the Holyfield draw perhaps you should watch it yourself and see for yourself who won the fight, cause I don't know anyone who saw the fight regardless of who they were routing for prior to the fight who thought that was a just decision.

So watch it yourself

Is that asking too much from a so called boxing fan???

Do you even watch boxing??? cause you sure don't know much about it

 

The excuse for Lewis winning? Sure...

No, it's Vitali fault that he lost.

You say nothing so keep up the empty insults.

Of course you wouldn't. You probably wouldn't bet against either Klitschko against any ATG.

How in the hell can it be too close to call if an older Lewis at a career high weight beat Vitali? Imagine what a peak Lewis what do?