Roy Jones Jr & Emanuel Steward were "On The Ropes" - NOW AVAILABLE ON DEMAND! 7/13

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Girl, Oct 3, 2010.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009

    There wasn't really much to score the Bika fight on, but Ward did seem to land with the odd cleaner shot round by round imo
     
  2. rainmaker

    rainmaker Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,218
    0
    Dec 15, 2009
    Damn right he put on a clinic, Health Clinic, Kessler got his eyes ****ed up pretty bad from deliberate head butts all night long! Any fighter would get demoralized and not getting any help from the ref to stop fouling. Kessler made the mistake of being a gentleman, and instead should have just fought fire with fire, but if you think you can use that win to elevate Ward to top of the tree you are mistaken.

    As for Froch in the Dirrell fight, look at what Froch had to put up with??? constant running, in some rounds not even attempting to throw shots. Then lets not forget Dirrell's "balance" problems, either he's got shitty balance for all his boxing skills, which don't make sense, or he would hurl himself to the ground everytime Froch went near him. Don't use that ***** Dirrell as a measuring stick for Froch being dirty. The guy fights hard and brings it, but Ward does go head butting and elbowing people.

    Also if we were measuring fighter's success based on just win loss record, then Muhammed Ali would be nowhere. Sure Ward is undefeated, so what? he's beaten Kessler and Miranda as his notable wins and never a win outside the US.

    As for Resume you admit that Froch has the better resume, having fought all over the place, against some tough guys and is a two time champ, yet you still rate Ward ahead? unbelievable!!! There is NO basis then to rank Ward ahead of Froch.

    Talk about desperation!
     
  3. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
  4. Boxing Girl

    Boxing Girl Guest

    Well this was bound to happen :lol:

    Alright, let me explain this one again.....and I will use the same FACTS I used with Rob Palmer.....

    You're difference of opinion on Froch's ranking is mainly based on the last 5 opponents of his being more impressive compared to Ward's....lets take a closer look at both and see how they compare.....

    Ward has never lost, and dominated Mikkel Kessler who was the champion at the time.

    Froch has a loss, in a close fight with Kessler who was coming off being dominated by ward, and most people scored this fight for Kessler.

    Froch has a win over Andre Dirrell in a close fight, which a lot of people scored it for Dirrell, and some say hometown cooking for the reason he got the decision.

    Froch has a win against Jermain Taylor.....a fighter that was coming off losing 2 of his last 3 fights (one by KO) and was winning on the cards and had dropped Froch before breaking down in the last round, in only his second fight at 168 (2nd Pavlik fight 164, so only Lacy)

    Froch has beat Arthur Abraham. This was the best performance of his career and he stuck to a game plan a lot of people thought he could not do. But Abraham is a fighter coming off a loss to Dirrell, where he was dominated, and has beat a true 168lb fighter. Also Abraham's own trainer call him a coward so it's clearly his effort was not his best in his eyes, and even though I still believe with Froch's game plan he still would of won the vacant belt....it would not of been as one sided as it was.

    Froch has beat Jean Pascal. This is the most impressive win on Froch's record. While Pascal was quite green and had never fought anyway of worth at the time. Pascal has improved quite a bit and even pulled off the upset win against Chad Dawson since then, so this win looks better then it then when Froch won the vacant belt.

    At the end of the day the Kessler win alone for Ward is enough to rank him above Froch at this time. He is the WBA super champion and he is still undefeated, and has defended his belt twice against won guy that many felt should of been in the tournament to start (Green, after Bute) and Bika who had a good win streak before the DQ loss in a fight that he was winning. So no matter what way you like to look at it Ward has to be ranked over Froch based on his biggest win, and Froch's biggest loss. I think it's quite fair to have Carl Froch ranked #2 at 168 based on his wins, which is below Ward, and just above Bute. Andre Ward is undefeated and even though he had been fighting at home, that has nothing to do with the wins he had got in this tournament.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    well you gotta realise it's an American show with three American hosts so they will always be biased towards American fighters.


    I feel there is too much anti-USA, pro-UK bias in your post, which leads me to assume that you are a brit.
     
  6. Boxing Girl

    Boxing Girl Guest

    No, it has nothing to with this at all. We have had Carl Froch on the show 4 times, and people love hearing him on the show more then Ward. We have Ward ranked above Froch based on facts that give him the edge over anyone else at 168. The biggest fact alone that stands above all else is that Ward dominated in the biggest fight of his career, and Froch struggled against that same fighter, losing to a man who had been one sidley defeated by Ward in his last bout. The ONLY way Froch can be ranked above Ward, is if Ward does not win the Super 6 or loses his next bout, cause at this point his 0 has him in higher regard then Froch's -1.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    That's bull****, PH|LLA.

    I don't play bias towards any fighter. I always call it like I see it. I might be wrong, and I might be wrong frequently but I have never shown any bias towards American fighters simply for being American.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    First of all, I wouldn't take anything that moron LukeO says too seriously.

    That said, not only do I agree with what you're saying here, I will also add that in a head-to-head fight, I believe Ward's style matches up quite favorably against Froch.

    At the end of the day, I like both of them a lot as fighters and as people. Both are super nice guys, and regardless of what happens to either of them in the Super Six, I think they both provide us with more entertaining fights in the current years.

    If I had to rank guys at 168, right now I would say:

    1. Andre Ward
    2. Carl Froch
    3. Lucian Bute

    I still believe Bute is terribly overrated by many on this site.

    Unlike Bute, Froch has actually been consistently squaring off against top guys at 168, so he is head and shoulders ahead of Bute as I see it.

    And honestly, Kessler is probably better than Bute, too, now that I think about it.

    :smoke
     
  9. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    In brief she's saying that the best fighter they both fought was Kessler. Who was beaten one sided by Ward and won a close fight against Froch.
     
  10. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    Don't make me hate you.
     
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol:

    Again, just calling it like I honestly see it. :good
     
  12. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    C'mon man how can you say a faded , shot , half blind old Kessler is better.
    Yes I agree with PRIME Kessler being better but not the present Kessler.
    And Froch is no way Had & Shoulders above Bute at least not H2H. Didn't you saw the men was losing on points against any guy with good footwork , hand speed and half of brain that had a game plan ? (e.g Taylor/Dirrell/Kessler)
    You don't think Bute can be just a little better then a post-prime Taylor and a little more experienced than than Dirrell was at his first title fight. Cuz he will certain have a plan... that's for sure.
     
  13. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    You guys should invite Bute's trainer Stephan Larouche for once. I'm sure you'll find his quite a knowledgeable guy. Just a suggestion. I'm guessing you can't invite Bute because he doesn't speak English.
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I gotta disagree with you. You show alot of bias towards American fighters, sometimes blatently. It's not that big a deal.
     
  15. rainmaker

    rainmaker Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,218
    0
    Dec 15, 2009
    Gotta disagree with virtually all you have said there. Ward may be unbeaten, but his toughest challenge has been Kessler right? at home to Kessler, the same Kessler that Cazaghe dismantled. Ward fouled a lot in this fight and that taints his win. Let me tell you this, Froch losing out to Kessler away from home in a closely fought fight without any fouling, in my eyes not too far off a win which was at home and controvercial. One win, you are basing Ward's credentials on ONE WIN, one big fight in his home town as justification for Ward being the top dog. Don't try and tell me Miranda is a good win, or Alan Green, or even Bika. Bika is a second tier super middle.

    You go on about Abraham, but stylistically MANY and including you guys felt he would pose a problem stylisically for Froch in that he's a very dangerous opponent. Now all of a sudden cos his manager said he was a coward, means that wasn't the same Abraham in that fight, just cos his trainer said so! not the fact that Froch took Abraham who fights this way all the time, was made to look very poor. Credit is due to Froch for neautralizing Abraham's strengths. That is actually a better win than Wards win against Kessler.

    A top resume consists of more than just one fight! and you are crowning Ward the top guy on the Kessler fight, why can't you look at their achievements on the whole and forget about this win loss and Kessler nonsense! Froch traveled to Taylor's backyard and took him out. Many Americans heavily favoured Taylor at the time, no good saying he was washed up now. Dirrell lost the fight cos he didn't come to fight, as simple as that, and his antics cost him. But it's still a W for Froch and goes on the resume. Froch beat a future LHW champ in Pascal who beat down had Dawson and Diaconu.

    What I think is going on, is your hyper praise of Ward exists on 2 levels. Firstly the patriotic one, and secondly the speculative level. Based on his potential and boxing skills you are rating him as number one, rather than achievement. So why not come clean and accept atleast one of the two levels mentioned here, rather than try to say the guy is number 1 based on his acomplishments cos thus far he's not done it, and no amnount of bigging up that Kessler win will fool anyone.

    The guy is a potentially great fighter but there has been many potentially great fighters not live up to expectation. Ward has not been pushed as yet in a way Froch has, and it takes alot more than jsut boxing skill to be considered great. Ward still has a way to go, he may or may not get there but he's not the number 1 SMW and is around about Bute's level in terms of achievements.