Texas refusing to release Pac Marg test results

Haters from ESB.

 

My favorite Pacroid quote is, "Mayweather is bigger than me, if I was bigger than him, blood testing would benefit me!":nut

 

Source? It's hard to keep up in this thread.

 

Nevermind, just read Margarito's manager saying they are ready and willing to release his results.

Even if Margarito's results come back negative, it doesn't mean anything until we see results from both teams. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Rafael never said that anyone tested positive, only that he couldn't get the results himslf.

 

No you are not wrong. Rafael just said they wouldn't release the results.

 

Margz is clean. pac however might be on the good ****.

 

Im sure if margo tested positive they would gladly throw him under the bus but if top ranks golden ticket tested positive??? :think:think

 

its texas. what do you expect

 

This content is protected

 

Yeah its actually supposed to look like the graph below so the above could be counterfeit.

This content is protected

This content is protected

http://www.livestrong.com/lance-armstrong/blog/lance-armstrong-drug-testing-results-august-2009/

 

Wow Philla, i'm starting to like you. :thumbsup

 

I also found the chart interesting in that USADA only did Urine test and had UCLA do all their blood tests

In another article: "Need to know "background" to all this is that the Nevada interests are still "frosted" that the blood testing arrangements for the May 1 Mayweather-Sugar Shane Mosley bout in Las Vegas were strictly a private, contractual matter btween two Golden Boy promoter fighters and did not involve the state boxing board in any manner or form. It's my understanding that only the always negative results and test dates were casually reported to Nevada. "

Voy, former Chief Medical Office of the USOC, said current blood testing as to HGH is "ureliable and impractical." He also said, "HGH is out there and there's not much we can do about it."

Voy also said that while tiny amounts of blood are drawn for testing "it can be dangerous."

That was a theme Dr. Watson chimed in on, saying, "I believe that urine is the best substance to test. I agree with Dr. Voy that urine (random testing) is what we should require and that blood is not necessary.

"I agree with Dr. Voy that there are theoretical and real risks to blood testing one of which is a (boxer getting) a hematoma on the elbow or a clot from missing a vein. There are also HIV and Hepatitis C risks."Dr. Watson said blood testing should be curtailed "within three to four weeks before (a fight) so that the hemotoma risk does not put a fighter at a disadvantage."


"Although it was noted that blood testing has caught merely one HGH cheater (a British rugby player) in eight years, Tygart said "in the next few months" a reliable blood test will be available which can nab HGH users 14 to 21 days after usage."

On the other hand, Urine tests have caught lots of boxers and UFC fighters
http://www.examiner.com/boxing-in-national/urine-tkos-blood-nevada-boxing-drug-testing-debate

 

lucky *******! :yep

 

OHHH big surprise here....

 

Moar like unfortunate *******.

This content is protected