Irish Thunder: The Hard Life and Times of Micky Ward

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Nov 22, 2010.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    100
    Dec 26, 2009
    mad good book it focuses a lot on his life and how he was treated as a kid
    i definitely recommend it
     
  2. boza81

    boza81 Member Full Member

    398
    2
    Nov 11, 2010
    I remember this. Sauol Mamby fell out, so he was replaced at the last minute by Mike "Machine Gun Mungin. According to boxrec.com, Mungin weighed in at 145 and Ward was at 136.5. Maybe Ward was outweighed by 18 pounds at the time of the fight, but not at the weigh in. Back then, they usually did the weigh in the day before the fight. Mungin had been largely inactive due to a prison sentence, but had fought at 140 earlier in his career. He was left handed and fast, hence the nickname. He was just too fast for Ward, although weight probably played some part - The biography and movie, althought I haven't seen/read them, may exagerate this event, as Hollywood often does. Other fighters have overcome big weight disadvantages, look at Paquiao against Margarito.

    I like Mickey, but he was basically a club fighter who had a great Trilogy with Gatti.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mungin was 8 1/2lbs heavier according to Brec
     
  4. willmc83

    willmc83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,198
    0
    May 20, 2010
    i think thats a little harsh, the film is being made on its own merits. he was an amazing fighter and led an amazing life. his achivements were all the more remarkable given his age and natural ability.
     
  5. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,862
    12,301
    Feb 2, 2006
    Mungin was more then 8lbs-I saw the fight and he looked aot bigger then Ward,

    Ward a club fighter?Don't know too many club fighters that appear on HBO/ESPN numerous times and get paid 6 figures multiple times-perhaps you can give me some examples.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Well, hopefully the book is more of a straight bio and takes fewer liberties than the film.

    It's a great film, FWIW. It's just chock full of fallacies.

    They have the Mungin bout (which is indeed the "he's got 20lbs on me" moment from the trailer) taking place in 1993 after Ward was on a skid losing "a few fights in a row", as opposed to the reality of it being his second professional defeat in 1988 and coming off four straight wins. The 4 consecutive losses didn't happen until years later in '90/'91.

    They also portray the KO win over Sanchez as being a direct launchpad into the title shot against Neary (making it out that Sanchez had been in line for that shot) - ignoring that three years passed and Ward lost twice in between.

    They also just plain fabricate the names of a bunch of boxers Ward never actually faced leading up to the Sanchez win - Maneti, Collins, Hernandez - who? They all served as part of a "Back In The Saddle" montage of knockout wins.

    As for the Neary win, they essentially make it into a clone of the Sanchez performance (which it really wasn't) - with Ward portrayed as getting battered for 7 rounds before mounting a miraculous comeback KO in the 8th inspired by his brother's words. It was just pure feel-good fluff. Oh, and in this fictionalized account the WBU title is a genuine and respected "world title". As us Ward fans are too well aware, his fantastic overachiever's career was never adorned with any real championship.

    They also make a lot of how Dick Ecklund boasted of having knocked SRL down (at the conclusion of the 9th round of their meeting, when he steps over Ray's face en route to the neutral corner), and how many of his sycophantic neighbors and relatives bought into it. The footage clearly shows SRL going down as a result of a shove/slip (which was the correct call at the time), so it's hard to believe that anybody - even under the influence of crack and nostalgia - could honestly think otherwise. I don't know if that bit was just poetic license or if there were actually people in Lowell who held to such a silly notion.
     
  7. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    If these boxers lives are so interesting and amazing lives to warrant a movie in the first place, then why do movie makers constantly dick about with timelines, events, names etc?

    I understand the pacing of movies, the necessity for action scenes every so many times but surely any boxers life is going to have sufficient action in it to negate the need for the historical editing that goes on in some of these films

    Like the poster above says about the many discrepancies in the movie, why cant they just have '3 years later' or somesuch come up? its a biopic you would expect that wouldn't you? they rely too much on non boxing fans having no knowledge of reals events and ignore the fact that much of the core audience for this type of movie is going to be a boxing fan, it ruins the enjoyment of the film and makes it less a biopic and more an entertainment piece very roughly based on a real person

    Rant over!!
     
  8. brettcon

    brettcon New Member Full Member

    86
    4
    May 25, 2010
    I read it about 4 years ago and I loved it. I don't remember it well enough to give a proper review, but I believe I thought it was well researched and written. The story is, of course compelling.
    Something else "Fighter" related that was riveting was an HBO documentary called "High on Crack Street." You can find it on Youtube. Edit: No longer o0n Youtube. Anyway it follows the trials and tribulations three crack addicts in Lowell, Mass. in the late 80s. One of them is Dicky Eklund.
     
  9. brettcon

    brettcon New Member Full Member

    86
    4
    May 25, 2010
    {QUOTE}

    "They also make a lot of how Dick Ecklund boasted of having knocked SRL down (at the conclusion of the 9th round of their meeting, when he steps over Ray's face en route to the neutral corner), and how many of his sycophantic neighbors and relatives bought into it. The footage clearly shows SRL going down as a result of a shove/slip (which was the correct call at the time), so it's hard to believe that anybody - even under the influence of crack and nostalgia - could honestly think otherwise. I don't know if that bit was just poetic license or if there were actually people in Lowell who held to such a silly notion.[/QUOTE]



    For years Dicky claimed to have knocked Leonard down, although he later admitted it was a push.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    The movie is actually as much about Dickie as it is about Micky.

    Dickie's part focuses on his transition from believing he can still mount a comeback in his late 30's/early 40's and having HBO make a documentary about him, which he tells everyone is about his comeback but is in fact about crack addiction in Lowell. In his journey he has to let go of the past (and his habits) and let Mick be his own man.

    Micky's story is actually somewhat secondary to that, and centers on his (fictional) ultimately-realized hopes for a world title as well as the growth of his relationship with Charlene and the strain it put on his bonds with his family.

    The book, presumably, is more about Micky (and again, more accurate). Bob Halloran is a decent journalist; I've read several of his sports articles in local papers over the years.
     
  11. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    20
    Jul 21, 2010
    Hard to believe they wont include the Gatti fights in the main film. I know casual film goers like the feel good ending in him realising a dream and winning a title but the fights he will be most remebered and the ones that defined him as a fighter are the Gatti fights. Imo the film would have been just as good if they included all the Gatti fights including both he lost. Its just an old fight movie cliche where an underdog wins the world title. In the first rocky film they had Rocky losing to Creed and that didnt diminish the film, in fact it made it even better.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Including the Gatti fights just for the sake of doing so would have been every bit as tacky as pretending his WBU win represented the cathartic achievement of a lifelong dream to be world champ.

    This part of his life (even with the bits they jumbled out of order) was well before his FOTY period (spanning his meetings with Augustus and Gatti). Stretching the plot out just to include them would have been stupid. That so many fans would demand the inclusion of Gatti is predictable and regrettable. Just enjoy those fights for what they are. They don't need a movie made about them. The dynamic shifts in Ward's complex relationship with his half-brother provided a far more compelling film subject than the twilight of his career, where he went 2-3 over the course of two years after having already considered permanent retirement. Those fights are a story unto themselves, and deserve to stand alone as such. There's no need to fictionalize them.
     
  13. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    20
    Jul 21, 2010
    Aye im just one of those people who when watching a fight movie tend to concentrate more on the boxers career than the overall plot. I suppose you have to make the film appealing to the general public who would pay as much if not more attention to the overall plot of the film :good
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Personally, as a big Ward fan (and Ward-Gatti trilogy fan) I was relieved that the film was going to focus on the earlier part of his career, with which I was less familiar. That's actually why it was so disappointing that they had so many factual errors and chronological disorder.
     
  15. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Maybe this is petty, but I just can't get behind a biopic about a guy in his forties who was an active fighter pretty recently. I'm sure his early struggles are inspiring, probably not moreso than a million other athletes, but why not let him be for awhile and see how he does as a trainer? If I want to "remember" Micky at this point, I'm going to watch Ward - Gatti I and Ward - Augustus. I'm all for vehicles that get non-boxing fans interested, but unless this thing starts getting seriously rave reviews, Mark Wahlberg isn't getting my ten bucks.