Results from the Simpson-Lindsay bill

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by slapbangwhallop, Dec 15, 2010.


  1. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
  2. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
  3. mckay_89

    mckay_89 Haw you! Full Member

    4,600
    23
    Dec 7, 2008
  4. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
  5. almsn

    almsn Guest

    Jaffa needed that a ko man .
     
  6. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    To avoid spoilers or to promote your site ???:think
     
  7. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
    a least I am not claiming bogus "world exclusives" you bullshiter! :nut

    :lol:
     
  8. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,376
    11,881
    Apr 19, 2010
    great fight simpson v lindsay, nice one simpson got the result well earnt:hey
     
  9. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    What 'World Exclusives' have I ever stumbled across ??
    :bart
     
  10. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    I've not seen these fights yet but "Shinny Bayaar robbed"?

    I heard that the fight was stopped on a cut from a clash of heads in the first?

    Them's the rules. The rules may be **** but that cant be a called a robbery. I agree that it should be a no-contest and a rematch mandated, but the rules are that the decision goes to the other fighter. Unfortunate. But not a robbery.
     
  11. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
    No its a robbery. ******ed prehistoric rules of the BBBoC robbed Bayaar of his title. Plain and simple.
     
  12. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    Agree to differ then. When a result follows the rules, it's not a robbery in my book. The rules should be changed, but thems the breaks. He isnt the first and he wont be the last. He should get a rematch pronto though.
     
  13. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
    well actually he probably will be the last because they are ditching the rule in January.

    If they knew it was a ball of spastication, why not void it with immediate effect.

    A fighter can be ten rounds up in the fight, the other guy sticks the nut in and opens him like a can of spaggetti hoops and the nutter win! sus-sus-sus-scandalous!
     
  14. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    Didnt know that. Cheers. About time!!
     
  15. NSFW

    NSFW ESB interacial lovin... Full Member

    3,795
    0
    Apr 30, 2010
    Enjoyed the boxing last night. Great to see Jaffa stop that dude in such a cool fashion and well done to Simpson on his win...