I thought I advised you to stay off this thread, to save yourself further humiliation . Completely wrong again. Typical of you atsch. Losing a fight dosent make a fighter useless or mean the fighter lacks credit, but who they lose to, how they lose and how they dont come back does. ie Froch lost to an unwell double vision suffering Kessler (a bad fight to lose), but look at the whole picture. The fight was away, and Froch was badly disrupted with the flight cancellations and training etc, he hurt Kessler more than anyone else and the fight was close. Froch also has good wins over Pascal, Taylor away, Dirrell and Abraham, 2 of which were undefeated fighters. Froch has come back well and has a good resume, even with a close loss. Green for example got beat by Miranda, has no wins of note and after losing to Ward got KOd in his very next fight Get it now atsch
:-( I dont want to hear this bull**** excuse...Again, that means nothing to me. I dont care what you type of level these guys were at..The point is they are solid wins if they lost before or not! Get it through your head that you downplaying wont change ****!
You see, you are back pedalling now. I gave you an example when you pushed for one, and once again it totally dismantles your arguement. Froch as I explained would be a solid win, but you think Abraham would be a solid win for Ward when he has just been brutally exposed twice atsch. So a fighter that has no real pedigree in a weight above and who clearly loses his last 2 fights, is a notable win to you
Rudyard, you are totally fooled by hype and name recognition. You have a belief that if you dont know a fighter that he cant be any good atsch
I'm done here because you're just rehashing the exact samething you've said for the past 30 minutes! Nobody agrees with you but your bitchass butt buddy Headgiver! I'm done answering this dumbass ****...I've stated my piece and I'm sticking by that! Argue with yourself!:verysad
:huh Who dosent agree with what? This will be another question you wont be able to answer. This is all based on me giving you some facts that you couldnt accept :-(. Now do the best thing, which is what I advised you to do earlier and leave the thread in shame :hi:
Well it looks like Rudyard has finally done the right thing and left the thread in shame. He has been left to lick his wounds before he gets mauled again on an elite thread :good
got to say, in a way, my respect for crudfart grows everyday :think he is without doubt the most pwned poster in esb history and constantly falls for the hbo / ring comic hype that leaves him looking like an ignorant, narrow minded dumb ass when these hype jobs get exposed, but he never hides, he gets up at a count of 8, dusts himself down and keeps coming back for more (like dennis andries against glass jaw thomas hearns :dead) :deal its pretty obvious that crudfart doesn't have the mental capacity to debate on elite threads but you can't help but respect his resiliance and his desire to compete against team elite knowing that one slip up from myself, bailey, or 46and0 and a basement sewer rat, tranny queen like crudfart could catipult himself into esb superstardum amongst the giants of the forum :deal
Like hyping William Joppy as a good win for Bute? :huh It was a gimme...closer to a tune up then legitimate title fight...
You call that hyping . I dont know how you get that with me saying they are gimmes, that just add a bit of depth atsch. It seems you keep trying to draw attention to Joppy. I never rated him and havent said so on here. I havent even said Bute has any big wins, that was somethinmg you said. You cant pick holes that easily
Whatever dude...you added him to your list of significant wins for Bute. You did what you accuse Americans of doing. Now you're backpeddling. Why'd you include him in the first place? Or ****in Brinkly for that matter?