Amir is currently 24. emmanuel's noteworthy victory at that age was the TKO over Hall of Fame lock Barrera, emmanuel's senior by 5 years at the time. Seeing Amir struggling with Maidana would suggest he doesn't have the same level of talent as emmanuel. What Amir does have over Cotto is that he's a young guy working with a HOF lock trainer, who has already mastered his craft. Cotto was being trained by his uncle and was loaded with technical flaws because of it. Speed is probably the most important athletic trait, Amir has loads of it, and Cotto does not. I see Amir being better than Cotto if he continues to be dedicated to his boxing. What I want to see is how much Amir will develop his ring IQ. There was an interview done way after he was knocked out, and he said that it's intelligence that wins fights. You can see that he'll be better if he develops his own style instead of trying to be so much like emmanuel. I like to see him use another style, since he's a tall guy with an excellent jab, terrible chin, and average power.
Give Khan a break, he is also just 24. Pacquiao at the same stage was still being dropped by guys like Skinny Hussein.
emmanuel was always going to be a stylistic nightmare for Cotto. Flat footed, coming forward, left hooker, no clinch game, not good at boxing off the backfoot, and unable to counter emmanuel = roasted.
exactly, a better trainer meant cotto would be safe a few rounds longer but in the end he still loses
Technically you are correct, but he was turning 25 that year. Khan has just turned 24. My point is he has the potential to get better. Whether he does or not is another story.
I think the problem with Cotto is when he gets seriously tagged he reverts to a brawling style which worked against him with a speedier fighter. He does pretty well against dancers because he can smother them if they don't have an inside game. With Khan I think the Maidana fight was an anomaly in that he was trying to prove something to the people rather than that was his gameplan.