Both were lucky to draw with old men who were around 17 years their senior. Who would take this non-fight? Pastrano with the skill and elusiveness, or Pascal with whatever talent he may or may not have?
Pastrano would have danced, jabbed and moved to decision Pascal. Pastrano would have also beaten Hopkins. Of course I'm talking of the Pastrano that decisioned Harold Johnson..not an out of shape, untrained version of Pastrano. He was so fast..would dance circles around both of them and would have jabbed them both sick.
Some guys just do anything to discredit modern fighters. A poster made a thread one time asking for suggestions on fights to watch, and wrote "no modern ****". atsch
Pastrano beats Pascal, of course. And, yes, he'd beat a 46 year old Hopkins. Hopkins is not better than Harold Johnson was.