last nights Bernard Hopkins vs prime Michael Spinks

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Prince, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    11
    Aug 26, 2009
    Spinks easily beats last nights Hopkins, and a prime Hopkins for that matter.
     
  2. gilad

    gilad Active Member Full Member

    577
    10
    Mar 4, 2006
    LOL on easily beating a prime Hopkins. No fighter in history 160-175 beats a prime B-Hop "easily" dude. He may be the best technical fighter since WW2.
    But I agree that B-Hop loses an 8-4 / 7-5 decision to Spinks. B-Hop is better than him pound for pound but his best weight is clearly 160, he is too skinny and has no punch at 175.
     
  3. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    Spinks wins. Hopkins looked good last night but he had a limited guy in front of him with a lot of technical flaws. Spinks style is all wrong for Hopkins. Spinks vs. Hopkins last night or prime UD for Spinks.
     
  4. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Old man river Hopkins will be an old man in the river after tasting a barrage of Spinks combinations
     
  5. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    102
    Jun 30, 2008
    Spinks would batter Hopkins, obviously. Probably ends in a knockout too, though that would be tough. It wouldn't be unreasonable to assume Spinks is the best H2H Lightheavyweight ever, he's certainly in the top 3.
     
  6. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,895
    3,276
    Jun 30, 2005
    Hopkins has a tough enough time in a p4p matchup in his prime against Spinks.

    A 2010 Hopkins against Spinks in his prime is just not fair to the old guy.
     
  7. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
  8. Mr.Pefect

    Mr.Pefect New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Apr 1, 2011
    A prime Spinks all the way.
     
  9. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    11
    Aug 26, 2009
    RJJ beat him easily at 160, but to be fair he was still green then...

    But youre right, Hopkins has too much ring craft and old school savvy to lose "easily". On the other hand i still see prime RJJ winning 8/4 9/3 again purely based on the stylistic clash between the two fighters
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    the difference between Pascal and Michael Spinks? I think Spinks stops Hopkins in about 5 rounds in a one sided fight after Hopkins makes some interesting exchanges in the early rounds. Then Michael takes over and stops Bernard. Spinks is the kind of guy who stops guys who handpick like Hopkins has been doing. Spinks was the real deal.
     
  11. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,555
    Oct 5, 2009
    that bernard wasnt anything special pascal was ahead and mailed it in

    prime spinks wouldnt lose to a 46 yr old blown up middle
     
  12. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    11
    Aug 1, 2010
    Spinks would beat any light-heavyweight in history aside from maybe Patterson (at least the LHW I've seen). I'd pick him to stop Pascal-Hopkins II inside 3.
     
  13. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    obviously Spinks... only reason Hopkins is still relevant is because of crappy fighters like Pascal
     
  14. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    Look I love B Hop, but Michael Spinks is a mighty tall order... He just hit too hard for Ex. Hopkins would have some measures of success against Spinks in the early going,but. At some point, Spinks would catch him and Spinks could get it dome with either hand, bomb of a right hand or a left uppercut that could damn near rip your head off ! Spinks by mid fight stopage. Same if Ex fought Bob Foster too.