Who do you rank higher ATG (P4P)? Hopkins or Monzon

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,459
    11,501
    Jan 6, 2007
    :good

    Consider yourself lucky.


    Some of us are a few years ahead of the old warrior.
     
  2. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Monzon. The old man can still fight though, so who knows how it ends up.
     
  3. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    Monzon's legacy is miles ahead of Hopkins' and will always remain so. How many middleweught defences did Hopkins make..25? Divide this by 3 to begin with, to account for the shitful current situation where there are loads of titles available. Then divide it by 3 again to account for the dilution of the quality of contenders available. Then divide it yet again by 3 simply because Monzon was by far the superior fighter :good
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    You are really honouring your nickname here. :good
     
  5. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    Why thank you

    p.s. Hopkins V Monzon head to head at their peaks results in Hopkins getting his head knocked off
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Most of Greb's best achievements are above 160. Whitaker and Duran are often rated 1 and 2 at LW despite most of their best work being above LW

    Anyway there isn't much between Monzon and Hopkins in MW resumes anyway when you actually examine the primeness of Monzon's best wins
     
  7. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    If a 28 year old Hopkins 5 years into his pro career couldn't beat Roy Jones then how ze fukk is he ever going to beat Monzon? :nut
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    I tent to interpret greates middleweight to mean:

    "Greatest fighter who was able to make the middleweight limit for the better part of their career".

    It is not entirely satisfactory, but it does get closer to the thrust of greatness.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Because Jones is 10times the boxer Monzon is?
     
  10. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,931
    11
    Feb 26, 2005
    As a pure middleweight,Monzon is superior.No ducking and one undisputed title at stake.Much tougher competition for Monzon.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,792
    46,494
    Feb 11, 2005
    Well, I don't give much credit to a guy because he got a draw against a crappy champ two divisions above and five years later, only after he was run out of the first division getting twice defeated by another less than stellar champion.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    And the fact that the guy was above 40 for all of that is of course a non-factor. :good
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Monzon was superior p4p as well as head to head.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,792
    46,494
    Feb 11, 2005
    Yes, he gets credit for being a good, old fighter, but he doesn't get more credit or a laxer set of criteria for excellence as a middle just because he was old.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,145
    13,104
    Jan 4, 2008
    What was the best we saw of a prime B-hop respective Monzon would you guys say? Tito/Mantequilla? What do you consider the best opposition they proved themselves against at MW?