How do you view Hopkins win over Winky Wright?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Commando, Dec 20, 2010.


  1. Commando

    Commando Guest

    He fought Winky in 2007 when he was 35 years old at a catch weight of 170 pounds. Something Winky has never did and never will do again. He wasn't proven at that weight before thaht fight the highest weight class he fought at was Middleweight, but he was a natural Light Middleweight. If Hopkins could have beat him at Middleweight it could have been a great win, but it wasn't.


    I personally rate Hopkins win over Oscar higher because at least De La Hoya was proven at Middleweight by his fight against Sturm. Even though I thought he lost that fight, he put up a good fight.


    This is how I rate his wins.


    1. Felix Trinidad
    2. Antonio Tarver
    3. Kelly Pavlik
    4. Glen Johnson
    5. Jean Pascal :yep (he won this god damn fight)
    6. Oscar De La Hoya
    7. John David Jackson
    8. WINKY WRIGHT
     
  2. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    I don't have a problem with that order, it seems about right.

    Trinidad is the only good win there though. The rest are just mediocre scalps.
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    What did Oscar prove in the Sturm fight other than how to get his ass handed to him?

    Winky was a better fighter at 170 than DLH was at middleweight, but that said, I don't think Hopkins even beat Winky. Had it a draw.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    How was Oscar proven at MW by his fight against Sturm

    The only thing Oscar proved against Sturm is that he wasn't serious about boxing anymore.
     
  5. Commando

    Commando Guest

    at least he fought there and put up a fight at least, Winky didn't.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,240
    83,149
    Nov 30, 2006
    It's a good win, but far from his best.

    If memory serves, the bookmakers actually had Hopkins was the underdog here (as he has been for nearly five years straight, sans the Ornelas and Jones fights) but sensible fans thought the bigger better and craftier (yes, craftier) man would win. He really ought to have been the favorite heading in.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins was 4/5, Winky was evens

    edit. sorry it was the opposite.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,240
    83,149
    Nov 30, 2006
    Hmm, what site?

    BetUs and Sportsbook had Winky -150.
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    sorry it was the opposite. Hopkins 1/1 (+100), Winky 4/5 (-125)
     
  10. Normen Bates

    Normen Bates Member Full Member

    399
    0
    Nov 30, 2009
    Its alway nice to have a fighter like Winky Wright on your resume or victims list, but Bernard Hopkins fought him out of his element as he did with Kelly Pavlik. Wins like that have to be placed in perspective, was it an impressive name to beat, yeah, but he can't get the full fledged credit of beating Winky Wright.

    In all seriousness I completely forgot about that fight, mainly because it was boring just like most Bernard Hopkins fights. I love to watch is mastery but sometimes its far from entertaining.
     
  11. DoubleM

    DoubleM Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,395
    371
    Nov 20, 2009
    the guy made Winky move up 10 lbs I think. More than Mayweather/Marquez.