Huck or Lebedev?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Larry Merchant, Dec 21, 2010.


  1. Larry Merchant

    Larry Merchant Your Larry Full Member

    432
    0
    Oct 12, 2010
    I would be fine with a draw if not a close decision for Lebedev.

    Which fight was closer, Pascal-Hopkins or Huck-Lebedev?
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,091
    27,827
    Jan 18, 2010
    I'm not German, but why does Germany get so much stick on the robbery issue?!
    Of course it's bad over there, but most of the worst robberies of the past few years were in the good ol' US of A. So USA = Robbery?
    It's everywhere and it has to stop. If a boxer visits another country he almost always gets the short straw, and it's everywhere. Only more clear in the US because so many fights are held there, and Germany because of their bad name.

    To anwer the question... Leb should have won it.
     
  3. Larry Merchant

    Larry Merchant Your Larry Full Member

    432
    0
    Oct 12, 2010
    Hometown fighters will always have the advantage to be favoured on the scorecards.

    It was always like that and it will be always like that folks.

    No sport is more corrupt than Boxing. Who should know it better than me folks.

    I would not call either of Satudays fights a "robbery".

    Pascal and Huck did enough to retain their belts.
     
  4. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    I think its the most obvious and common in Germany, only guys that didnt get robbed there in recent memory were haye and chambers.
    But yes all home town fights are biased, even in the us if its a hypejob vs unknown fighter the uinknown guy gets screwed over.
    But how do you stop the hometown robberies, its very difficult to make that change.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    This. Both were hometwon decisions. But not robberies. I thought Hopkins won more clearer than Lebedev. I can see the arguments for Pascal and Huck though. There should be rematches.
     
  6. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    That´s just bs. Tell me who was robbed there? Most of the so called robberies are just close fights blown out of proportion because they happened in Germany. For example an relative unknown guy without a striong promoter like Gulyakovich beats a German headliner like Tajbert in a close fight in Germany, that could have gone to Tajbert actually, I scored it 115-113 for Gulyakevich. But yeah, of course that doesn´t fit the bill and so get´s ignored. Instead close fights like Sylvester-Karmazin, I had Sylvester winning, or Huck-Lebedev, I had Lebedev 115-113, get blown out of proportion. But okay, every fighter who comes to Germany and doesn´t get knocked out claims to have been robbed and there are enough people dumb enough to believe it. Like you. Sorry but robberies are as common in Britain, the US, France or anywhere.

    But then one doesn´t need to wonder. Most people on here give every round to the fighter who stumbles forward throwing punches and ignore the rest of the game. I couldn´t care less about them.
     
  7. Larry Merchant

    Larry Merchant Your Larry Full Member

    432
    0
    Oct 12, 2010
    And just for the record, If Huck and Pascal would have been the challengers for the title and not the Champions, both would have lost.

    Obviously Huck and Pascal knew that they just have to "survive" the rounds and do barely enough to win in their homecountry.

    The challenger has to beat the Champion "decisively" folks.

    Chambers did it (no title fight), but Dimitrenko was completely outlclassed, several knockdowns. To let Dimitrenko get the decision, now this would have been criminal folks!

    Haye just signed a 3-fight-deal with Sauerland before he fought Valuev, so of course they wanted him to win. (Fixed fight imo)
     
  8. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Oki lets make a little list:
    huck-lebedev
    lukas vs beyer
    sven ottke vs robin reid ( and many others)
    sturm vs gevor
    valuev vs holyfield
    Valuev vs ruiz
    zbik vs spada
    raoui vs kentikian
    sylvester vs karmazin
    stieglitz vs ornelas

    Say whatever you want but its well known that if you dont put on a dominant display you will get robbed in Germany if it goes to the point if youw in 8-4 or 7-5 you will lose on the cards, just like lebedev few days ago. I was suprised that haye got the decision vs valuev.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    This fits for nearly all fights but Ottke-Reid and Valuev-Holyfield (which wasn´t even in Germany :lol: ). Thanks for proving my point.
     
  10. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Ah the old take one point out to take away the whole argument.
    You dont have to so angry about it anyway. Its common sense that Its very difficult to win a decision in germany. And not all were clsoe fights a lot of 8-4 9-3 fights and yes some 7-5. And swiss robbery doesnt sound right anyway.
     
  11. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    German is like Rotten Apple when it comes to Boxing and Fair sports.

    It is not only those Home Town decisions/robberies but the whole system.

    Krauts Does Everything their Guy will Win there, Literally.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIL0Ussbjpc[/ame]

    7.10 mark:lol: Damn Slimy Germans

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoSA2_2RmzU&feature=related[/ame]
    2.12 Mark f'ing Referee Picking Sebastian sylvester Up when he was KNOCKED DOWN.:patsch

    I remember when these Fights were these Germans at Forum act like nothing suspicious happened. Especially when their German Hero Sebastian Sylvester were given his Crown Back:lol:
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    1. Which argument? You have none other than your opinion.
    2. I´m not angry. I don´t even like most of those fighters on this list. And this is the internet, as if I would care about the opinion of some geeks. :lol: I´m bored that´s all.
    3. "Common sense" is not an argument. That´s: most people think so, so I think so too. Billions of flies love sh*t. Do you too?
    4. Yes, all of those fights but the oney I mentioned were close, if you know how to score a fight. I bet you haven´t even seen all of those fights.
     
  13. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Yeah, because Hernandez won the fight.

    And f*cking hell, Asikainen lost this fight, get over it. The only controversy there was the one the Finns like you made up.
     
  14. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    god damn you are bad guy. Then again History has shown time after time of what You Germans have made off:yep

    Kraut is Kraut.
     
  15. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009