Pacquiao Vs. Mosely Possible at 148 Weight. to DEFEND 154 Belt.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Doc, Dec 21, 2010.


  1. SuspiciousChees

    SuspiciousChees Active Member Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Aug 7, 2010
    His belt is a joke, that is why fans are mad, the belts are becoming jokes because of stunts like this.


    No problem, have it as a non title fight then.

    They want it for the legacy, trying to blag the legacy instead of doing it legit.
     
  2. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Where do these stories come from. Pac weighed in at 144 last time, and why would they let Mosley come over the WW limit? I doesn't make sense, and I doubt Pac gives a **** about defending the 154lb title.
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    Henry Armstong fought in a defferent era. Thing are 100 times different today.

    It's essentially a WW fight @ 148. Besides, Shane isn't the most deserving opponent, I can admit that. To me, it's just a fight. I didn't give his title fight @ JrMW much thought, so right now, I'm not going to pretends to give it so much credence. Would make me a hypocrite to call a title bull**** one day,m then insist it's defended properly the next.
     
  4. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    No I don't, but that doesn't mean keep ****ing over history by continuing to do it because you can. You got the title on some BS, you can't even at least defend it properly? But you're the P4P #1 who amazingly went through the weight classes collecting titles.....
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    Did you just start watchuing? Belts have been a joke for a while now. Ranking are bought...mandatories are passed when conveient to make more money...stripped for political reasons... it's been going on over a decade.

    WHo cares what they label it? Same fighters are getting into the ring.

    Pacv's legacy is pretty much secure. They said it's a MONEY fight. Not legacy. YOU ARE adding the legacy portion placing words into their mouths.
     
  6. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    The Dehydrator strikes again!!!
     
  7. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Unacceptable IMO.

    What is different about the present and past that allows this to be okay? I don't get it.
     
  8. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    Another thing, you guys are acting like this already happened when the TS never even provided a source. The funnier thing is that none of you asked for a source, since most of you are probably pac haters who would immediately jump at one negative thing pac does even though its hypothetical.
     
  9. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    This is exactly what im talking about... its draining at 148 but its okay at 147.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    History? :huh A little over dramatic aren't we? Pac vs. Shane at 148 for the JrMW belt is virtually the same fight as Pac vs. SHane at 147.

    It's the FIGHT that people judge. You think there's a big difference in a fight @ 147 as opposed to 148 with these two?

    You focus on the belt now, but disregard it when it suited you before...
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    The landscape of boxing has changed. Do I really need to point out the obivous, the addition of the Jr divisions for one...
     
  12. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    The source is at a banned website that cannot be mentioned here, if you haven't visited that site today, your not a Boxing fan... LOL JK

    I go there everyday as I think most people do..

    You know when something is invisible it cannot be _ _ _ _ _
     
  13. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    When was it disregarded? I've always said the title fight at a catchweight is BS, and defending it at another catchweight is even more BS. The belt is disregarded by Pac fans who want to ignore the fact that he's ****ing over history. Yes history, will this not be recorded in history books? Okay then, it's ****ing over history.
     
  14. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    Okay and i would bet that a lot of these people didn't see that article either before they started to call him a fraud or saying "this isnt a surprise" or w/e. And one thing the article said is possible but not likely, but still you decide to make a thread acting like its possible and highly likely.
     
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    It was disregarded as a bogus title fight remember? A TRAVESTY TO THE SPORT remember? By most here who were pissed.

    He isn't ****in history over in anyway. Just fanboy hyperbole. And while it WILL be recorded in history, it won't been seen as anything great just as SRL's fight w/ Lolonde isn't considered anything great. NO ONE COUNTS that as some huge for SRL as far as I know. And that's why I see this as nothing morethen a regular fight.

    DOn't give the belt all this power if you didn't give it any before.