Even Calzaghe fanatics must now admit him or Hopkins isn't even a debate anymore?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Dec 21, 2010.


  1. left right left

    left right left Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,748
    1
    Aug 14, 2010
    Oh, okay. 'Sorry if I condescended you. The other day he made a post that started pro-Hopkins, turned pro-Calzaghe and ended up hate America, love U rop.
     
  2. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    :lol:
     
  3. Starched Him

    Starched Him Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,681
    61
    Feb 5, 2009
    tHE ONLY WAY I OULD GIVE THIS TO CALSLAPPY IS IF HE FOUGHT NARD IN HIS PRIME AND HE DID NOT

    NOT DISCREDITING THE WIN BUT HE DID BEAT A OLD HOPKINS WHILE STILL VERY GOOD BUT NOT THAT HOPKINS THAT WAS ONCE GREAT
     
  4. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Zaghe aged quicker, clearly. They had a chance to fight years earlier an nard refused. I'm guessing you wouldn't want it too early-as in around the time RJJ handled nard easily- with a damaged hand. Nard was like nearly 30 and RJ took him back to school.
     
  5. swayz

    swayz Guest

    :thumbsup
     
  6. the_baller

    the_baller Guest


    Why?
     
  7. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008
    Joe had Hopkins figured out by the 3rd round. Hopkins would lose any rematch by a wide margin.
     
  8. Daft P

    Daft P Active Member Full Member

    1,434
    128
    Feb 27, 2005
    Calzaghe indeed beats all of B-Hops opponent (I am not sure in Tarver though), I also saw him winning against B-Hop. Still, prime for prime (2000 version of B-Hop) Hopkins would KTFO Calzaghe, I am pretty sure.
     
  9. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Hopkins is miles ahead of Calzaghe in ATG rankings and it isn't even close. They are levels apart.
     
  10. the_baller

    the_baller Guest

    I think a Prime Tarver could have beat Calzaghe.

    The thing about Tarver, he fights with a great defense. And even though his fight style is basic, he uses his height and power to his maximum advantage and his jab was really good. Tarver makes you either try to make it an outside fight where he kills you with his jab or an inside fight where he shells up against effective shots and then blast you with his left hook when you open. Tarver had a real "meat and potatoes" style but it was very effective against some pretty good opposition. You look at Tarver's record and he beat some preety good opponents in his short time at pro, all of which while past his his prime.
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    This account must have been hacked. Arsebanger is the biggest troll turd on this forum, no decent poster could ever respect his one-line posts regurgitating the same boring shite every single day.
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    Yup.
     
  13. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    thought it was pretty universal that in career ATG rankings Hopkins ranks higher than Calzaghe. not very close in my opinion. Hokins has fought better opposition, beaten better opposition and yet still continues to ad to his legacy.
     
  14. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    I think the Kessler win is still a good one. He was a solid champ.
     
  15. the_baller

    the_baller Guest

    Kessler hasn't impressed anyone in a longtime and more and more the conscientious average fight fan is that he was more hype than anything else.