the version of lyle who fought foreman in the era of marciano.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by combatesdeboxeo, Dec 24, 2010.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    dont forget about Gonzalaz, Mercer (IMO he got robbed), and Carl the Truth Williams, :good
    All together about 8 good names to Lyle's 4. And I would say there was more quality in Spoon's wins. I would take spoon to take an easy decision over Lyle.
     
  2. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Lyle and his "power" are two of the more over rated things on this board.

    Lyle was a decent boxer with OK power and questionable durability. Marciano would walk him down and Charles/Walcott would decision him clearly enough. Lyle would be a good fighter just as he was in the 70's but not a champion.
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,462
    9,452
    Jul 15, 2008
    Lyle was a murderous puncher and very strong but :

    1. He started very late and never maxed out his skill set.
    2. He had average handspeed and slow foot speed.

    The result is that he could be outboxed ... Jimmy Young did it with ease and while I like Young he was not Walcoot, Moore or Charles by a decent shot ...The men Lyle hit he crushed ... ask Foreman, Bugner or Shavers .. all three call Lyle a murderous puncher ..

    The closest to a Marciano / Lyle fight was Lyle/Shavers who was only about 6' ... Earnie did not have Rocky's chin or stamina and he almost had Ron out early ... Rocky would ride it out and catch Ron at some point. It could have actually been a Dempset/Firpo or sorts but Rocky had a better chin and overall skill set ...
     
  4. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Lyle didn't crush Shavers.

    If anything, this fight shows that Lyle's "murderous" power is just a myth. He had to land bombs on the chinny Shavers for 6 rounds before he fell, and even then it was from accumulation and exhaustion.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I was serious. That Louis is highly underrated and overlooked. Still a serious contender.


    I was sarcastic and I agree with your post.


    :good
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,825
    46,541
    Feb 11, 2005
    whoops. my sarcasm meter was off.
     
  7. who ****ing hell was page,smith,snipes or bruno? pure garbage simple, the only decent was tubbs.
    bonavena(who fought a very close fight with joe frazier,who did beat chuvalo,zora foley,peralta,leotis martin..),bugner,jimmy ellis(who did beat floyd patterson,jerry quarry,chuvalo), buster mathis,peralta were better fighters who fought in a better era., and you are very boring repeating 100 times "chinny " shavers,this "chinny shavers did put down the ass of prime holmes, this "chinny" shavers destroyed jimmy ellis,norton (who did beat ali), joe bugner.. this chinny shavers was much harder puncher than marciano with both hands. change the argument , simply an advice.
     
  8. 1_ you are in every post about lyle saying always the same history " lyle is overrated, his power is overrated" blablabla, but the facts are that he is UNDERRATED and his hitting power and his great strength is underrated.
    2_ lyle had much more than "ok" power
    3_ the era of lyle was better than the era of marciano by a mile, so he would have been much better in this era.
     
  9. yes he did
     
  10. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    bonavena and Ellis were past prime no doubt about it. Peralta was good but a little undersized. Bugner was a solid win as was shavers. compared to spoons resume, lyle's is just a little shallow. most people would agree to this and not buy into the rediculous hype of the 70s.
     
  11. 1_lyle was 1 year older than bonavena, oscar did beat every rival after of the fight against lyle.
    2-ellis is just 1 year older than lyle, ellis was 34 and lyle 33.
    3_like i said... page,smith,snipes or bruno were pure garbage. tubbs was the only decent fighter, so how he had better resume
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,825
    46,541
    Feb 11, 2005
    this doesn't draw much credence. you're talking of four guys who either got a belt or were in breath of getting a belt. i guess shavers could be considered in the same vein, but he got his ass kicked pretty regularly and in the same fashion each time. his lackings were gaping and obvious.

    i'm happy that you're enthusiastic for a fighter. it's almost cute.
     
  13. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    yeah but you have to remember Ellis and bonavena had not looked good up to lyle and were clearly shot fighters they basically stopped fighting soon after Lyle so I don't think those were good wins

    how were those fighters garbage? definitely no worse then shavers. also witherspoon had beat mercer, Gonzalez, and Carl the truth williams. better resume then Ron no doubt about it. Ron's best wins are shavers and bugner. bugner was good but shavers is just another mythical puncher who had no substance, just a myth who anyone decent could beat.
     
  14. it is absolutely absurd .
    valuev was the champ, and? he is a complete bum too. it prove nothing.
    even a grandfather shavers almost killed a prime james tillis(who fought every round against mike tyson), imagine a prime sshavers.simply they fought in a harder era. bruno was destroyed by every decent fighter that he faced. if you are comparing bruno or smith with shavers, bonavena, jimmy ellis, peralta.. you are drunk
     
  15. 1_ post lyle ,bonavena fought 7 times and he won every fight by ud or ko, and then he was murdered in 1976.
    2_ if you are saying that they were not in their prime, then i can say that lyle was not in his prime either, because the had the same age.

    tommy you must be joking...
    the best thing and the only great thing that spoon did in his complete career was to fight a great fight against 34 years old larry holmes.and spoon was 25.

    he did beat garbages like reinaldo snipes by MD, he did beat greg page by MD, he did beat smith by decision and HE WAS DESTROYED IN THE REMATCH BY KO IN 1 ROUND. he did beat the bum frank bruno. he did beat bums like carl "the lie" williams by a sad sd, and the only decent victory was tonny tubbs in 1986.ray mercer was not a great thing because even the oldest larry holmes did beat him.

    his record was 55(38ko)-13.


    ron lyle 43(31ko)-7
    did his pro debut in his 30s, lyle did beat oscar bonavena by ud(who did put down and gave the hell of fight to frazier), ron lyle did beat jimmy ellis by ud ,goyo peralta, he did beat a prime joe bugner when lyle was 36, he destroyed a younger earnie shavers , he knocked out 29 years old buster mathis out in 2 rounds,(joe frazier did beat mathis in 11).
    lyle fought a war against foreman(8 years younger than him), he did put foreman down more of once, lyle fought a very good fight during 11 rounds against muhammad ali(younger than him), lyle lost against a prime jimmy young (7 years younger than lyle)(who did beat foreman and who was stolen against ali,norton and shavers). and lyle lost against quarry(younger than lyle) (a hell of fighter).we never saw a prime lyle in his 20s and still...
    where is the much better resume of spoon?