Can someone explain to me why Timothy Bradley is in the p4p top 10??!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Dec 30, 2010.


Page 2 of 12
  1. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    His resume is not great but its the best at 140 by far.

    Im not to where he should rank p4p it depends, what is your current list.

    How has khan proven he is a p4p top ten?
     
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    #16
  2. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    He's American. That's why.

    Just wait till Khan beats his arse.

    The only place Bradley's head will be is at the end of Khan's jab.
     
    Lazarus, Dec 30, 2010
    Lazarus, Dec 30, 2010
    #17
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    Khan's best wins at 140 are better than Bradley's, IMO. In saying that, I wouldn't have Khan near my top 10 at this stage either.
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #18
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    if floyd sets the bar for this discusssion with the thread starters concerns or questions..
    and in the last 5 years...only 6 fights...and 4 out of those 6 have the 35 year and up shot/age thing against them, with floyd winning a SD in one of those...fighting smaller guys like Hatton and Marquez who was 2 divisions smaller and a year ago would have been 4 smaller divisions. i would justify Bradleys status as more accurate than floyd being number 1 by fighting once a year and against anything but prime guys who actually have a shot and the public wants to see
     
    iceman71, Dec 30, 2010
    iceman71, Dec 30, 2010
    #19
  5. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    What the ****?

    How is better by FAR?

    Timothy's notable's:

    Junior Witter - SD
    Edner Cherry - UD
    Kendall Holt - UD
    Lamont Peterson - UD

    Khan's notable's:

    Andriy Kotelnik - UD
    Dmitriy Salita TKO 1
    Paulie Malignaggi - TKO 11
    Marcos Maidana - UD

    I don't understand how you call that BY FAR.
     
    Lazarus, Dec 30, 2010
    Lazarus, Dec 30, 2010
    #20
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010


    good post. never realized just how pathetic and underachieving floyd has been
     
    Beouche, Dec 30, 2010
    Beouche, Dec 30, 2010
    #21
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    Floyd isn't my number 1. But he is still far, far more deserving of a top 10 placing than Bradley.
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #22
  8. Antwuan Maxx

    Antwuan Maxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,248
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    I don't think Bradley belongs there to be honest, and I'd say Amir Khan has better quality wins at 140. But to be fair, I don't think Fernando Montiel belongs in the top ten either.

    I'll say this, though..comparing the current top ten to those of a decade ago is borderline depressing.
     
    Antwuan Maxx, Dec 30, 2010
    Antwuan Maxx, Dec 30, 2010
    #23
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    And I don't see how anyone can argue with this. :deal
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #24
  10. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Maidana is good but wasnt even champion, he was a contender and still is, where as Bradley has several wins over titlists.

    Dude go to the clinic floyd aint in this discussion yet you bring him up, this is about tim bradley.

    Now **** off pacturd
     
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    #25
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    Here is The Ring's Top 10 for year ending 2001:

    1. This content is protected
    2. This content is protected
    3. This content is protected
    4. This content is protected
    5. This content is protected
    6. This content is protected
    7. This content is protected
    8. This content is protected
    9. This content is protected
    10. This content is protected
    Unbelievable. We clearly didn't appreciate what we had at the time.
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #26
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    That's a technicality. Maidana would beat the living **** out of Witter, Cherry, Campbell, and Holt.
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #27
  13. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Laz stop being a butthurt pony.

    Far was the wrong word to use but it is definitely better.

    You forgot nate campbell and miguel vasquez
     
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    spud1, Dec 30, 2010
    #28
  14. Casamayor122

    Casamayor122 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,102
    6
    Oct 17, 2009
    Take out Salita for Khan and add Miguel Vasquez for Bradley.
     
    Casamayor122, Dec 30, 2010
    Casamayor122, Dec 30, 2010
    #29
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #30
Page 2 of 12