Can someone explain to me why Timothy Bradley is in the p4p top 10??!

Spot on!

 

I never said khan was top 10, just that his resume was the best of the guys at 140.
Heres my top 10:

1.pac
2.floyd
3.martinez
4.marquez
5. wlad
6. montiel
7. donaire
8.juanma lopez
9: bute
10:wonjongkam

 

Canelo and Lemieux are where my chips are stacked for the next 5 years. :smoke Hopefully they can keep their "0"'s so I won't be forced to disregard them as hype jobs :nut

Bradley probably gets a little too much credit in P4P lists but I don't see why it's such a big deal. He wants big fights and is chasing big fights and is just starting to get paid; he's not Berto FFS. Let's see how the kid does this year against Alexander and Khan.

 

I'll try and see if i could go, i would LOVE to, but theres no gurantee on it. And yes I love Montiel to death..Every one is looking at Canelo at the moment, but i truely believe that Montiel can become Mexico's next great champion. A victory over Donaire, one over the bantamweight tourney winner, and picking up a 4th title will ensure that, and he has a good chance at doing that IMO, it'll be tough but not impossible.

 

i don't keep scorecards, i scored it whilst watching it, trying not to get swayed by the noise of the fanatical home crowd. anyway, i would prefer you to address the questions / points i brought up in my last post which was :






with regards to dawson, who would you have said adameks best wins were in the light heavyweight division?

does beating glen johnson make you a p4p fighter? if so there are 11 fighters who have a claim for that. beating pascal would surely prove nothing anyway, pascal is a b-level plodder who has had his ass kicked by froch and a 45 year old hopkins. there was maybe a case for having dawson scrape into a top 10 p4p ranking but to have as your number 3 ?

you didn't answer my question of where you ranked kessler in your p4p rankings before ward beat him?

think we can agree that ward has had the cards stacked in his favour in the super 6 - 3 hometown fights, a good win v kessler, but come on alan green is shite, and if you've got an ounce of fairness in you, the performance against bika was scrappy at best. now if ward had of beat the original line up that he should of faced in the super6 - kessler, (taylor?), and dirrell, then maybe there could be a case for you including ward as number 6. (btw, when you made those rankings, ward had not even fought bika yet anyway, so you were basing it purely on his fights with kessler and green).

 

Even if Khan beats Bradley and unifies the division, I bet he won't be as high as Bradley was this year come 2012.

 

So now we add fighters to a boxers resume solely based on the fact that they have the tools to beat them?

Since when?

 

Montiel is on a roll currently, and has been destroying his opponents the way he should be. His victory over Hasegawa is better than anything dudes like Bradley and Lopez have done so far. Take Lopez for example, he's in the top 10, and his best win was against a shot 35 year old Marquez, who is a career Bantam, and had an injured shoulder, yet Lopez managed to not look so good in beating him. He also struggled with someone like Mtgawa, and went life and death with him. Do you honestly think he deserves to be in the top 10 than someone like Montiel???

 

wtf, the froch point is totally irrelevant, i can accept why people think kessler won, it was just my opinion, its no big deal, i was just answering a question you asked because i never duck questions and run from discussion.


hopefully you will man up and address the civilized points i have made in this thread instead of ducking them for a 3rd time and trying to change the subject. as a reminder, i wrote :





with regards to dawson, who would you have said adameks best wins were in the light heavyweight division?

does beating glen johnson make you a p4p fighter? if so there are 14 fighters who have a claim for that. beating pascal would surely prove nothing anyway, pascal is a b-level plodder who has had his ass kicked by froch and a 45 year old hopkins. there was maybe a case for having dawson scrape into a top 10 p4p ranking but to have as your number 3 ?

you didn't answer my question of where you ranked kessler in your p4p rankings before ward beat him?

think we can agree that ward has had the cards stacked in his favour in the super 6 - 3 hometown fights, a good win v kessler, but come on alan green is shite, and if you've got an ounce of fairness in you, the performance against bika was scrappy at best. now if ward had of beat the original line up that he should of faced in the super6 - kessler, (taylor?), and dirrell, then maybe there could be a case for you including ward as number 6. (btw, when you made those rankings, ward had not even fought bika yet anyway, so you were basing it purely on his fights with kessler and green).