Can someone explain to me why Timothy Bradley is in the p4p top 10??!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Dec 30, 2010.


Page 8 of 12
  1. horst

    horst Guest

    Seriously though, where has Arsebanger disappeared to right in the middle of our discussion???

    That gimp has been on here all day, and as soon as I unleashed the Troll-Kryptonite, he vanished!

    :smoke
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #106
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    But I quite clearly do rate Dawson's resume. Haven't you been reading my posts?!?!?!??!!?!?!
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #107
  3. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009

    Haha, then I'm sorry but it's total bias. You can rate Dawson's mediocre resume at number 3 but someone is silly to have Bradley top 10!?! One of the biggest hypocricies I've seen from a generally intelligent poster.

    That's too silly a point to argue over I'm afraid. You normally make such good posts but I think even you can see the contradiction here.
     
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    #108
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,346
    3,442
    Dec 11, 2009
    I came on to a boxing forum and witnessed someone making racist accusations to another.
    No its not wrong to identify someone, but alot of false accusations get made, and I havent read one thing on this thread that deserved that kind of accusation.
    Spineless as you put it or not. To me there is no place for racism and racist accusations on a boxing forum. Its a shame you dont feel the same
     
    bailey, Dec 30, 2010
    bailey, Dec 30, 2010
    #109
  5. Jay23

    Jay23 Guest

    Comon even Dawsons own mother knows his resume is like wet toilet paper.:deal
    You can say it as often as you like but you wont get anyone to believe Dawsons resume is any good.
    Admit it you put Dawson to these lofty heights based mainly on talent and now you're calling people for doing exactly the same as regards Bradley.
     
    Jay23, Dec 30, 2010
    Jay23, Dec 30, 2010
    #110
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    It is a contradiction to think that Adamek and Johnson are much better fighters than Witter, Holt, Cherry, Abregu, Campbell, etc etc? :huh

    OK then. :lol:
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #111
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    No I'm not though. Read my opening post. People DO rate Bradley's resume, they don't only rate him on talent. I think he is talented, it's his resume that I am disputing.

    I think Dawson's best wins are significantly better AND I think he is more talented, hence why I rate him much higher.
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #112
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Fine, I'll start searching for the quotes from him so you can apologize for your comments to me on this thread, as I am calling racism justly. :good
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #113
  9. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009
    When did I say that!?!? Are you putting smiley faces and sarcastic comments because you know you're wrong!?!?!

    I don't have Bradley to 10 and I never argued that his resume is better that Dawson's. Read the post again.
     
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    #114
  10. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    6
    Jan 13, 2008
    bradley is also undefeated though and has never been knocked the **** out . but i dont think he is top ten just yet. after this year if he can beat alexander he will be
     
    Auracle21, Dec 30, 2010
    Auracle21, Dec 30, 2010
    #115
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    So I think Dawson's best wins are significantly better than Bradley's, and I think Dawson is more talented than Bradley, so how on Earth is it a contradiction for me to rate Dawson higher than Bradley??!?!?!?!??!

    :huh
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #116
  12. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009

    Unfortunately this is the truth.

    If Dawson's mixture of resume and talent can put him at number 3, Bradley's can have him at number 10 easily. Popkins realises this as he isn't silly, he just doesn't want to admit it now.
     
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    #117
  13. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009

    It's not, it's a contradiction to have Dawson at #3 based on this, and be critical of those who have Bradley at #10.

    The argument isn't about Bradley Vs Dawson. It's what's more illogical out of having Dawson at #3 and Bradley at #10!!!!!

    You're either slow or deliberately avoiding the point because you know you're wrong!!!
     
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    GDG, Dec 30, 2010
    #118
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't really understand where you're coming from. I am not the person who decides The Ring top 10, and sends it out to the world as the definitive list. I rank fighters as I see fit, same as everyone else.

    At that point in time, I felt Dawson's best wins/performances allied to his talent made him one of the top fighters in the game. I firmly believe he will re-establish this status this year with a dominant victory in the Pascal rematch.

    At this point in time, I do not feel Bradley has proven his potential in big fights with proven opponents, therefore I do not believe he merits the same status.

    Why does my opinion cause you such anguish?
     
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    horst, Dec 30, 2010
    #119
  15. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Everytime I look at that list it saddens me at the lack of talent around today. Past Mayweather and Pacquiao we have no true elites, Wlad and Martinez are probably the next along, then past that, you basically have to come up with another 6 names from a bunch of A-fighters. The fact that Cabellero was at one point considered P4P for beating Steve Molitor says it all, and that Donaire found himself at #4 on the Ring's list after beating virtually nobody of note since Darchinyan.
     
    TommyV, Dec 30, 2010
    TommyV, Dec 30, 2010
    #120
Page 8 of 12