Nowadays it seems if fighters are 30 fights onwards and they have a bad night in the ring , there considered shot or over the hill , but in the old days and not even that far back fighters like julio and robinson would go on forever and not loose , isit just that fighters nowadays arent as special and life is to easy for them ?
Fighters like RObinson and Chavez are the exception not the rule, and both were pretty much past it at 35 anyway
I think the reverse is true ... fighters nowadays can go on a lot longer without being exposed as severely over-the-hill, because they can pick and choose their fights more, take layoffs to heal injuries, go look for a mediocre "world champion" with a free slot and get endless shots at easy title fights. They can almost always find a big name or a 'world class' fighter who is more shot than them, or just not very good to start with. Look at Roy Jones Jr. for example. He was proven finished in 2004, completely done, but got ressurected for wins over Felix Trinidad, and Jeff Lacy, and was built up as a good opponent for Calzaghe, (who himself was well-preserved 37 year-old largely due to a career of mostly easy pickings!).
Only a total moron would have bought into Jones being rejuvenated by wins over handpicked patsys like Lacy and (at that stage) Tito. He was more shot than Sonny Corleone in Godfather 1.
Couldn't disagree more: Bernard Hopkins - peaked aged 36, still fighting at the top level at This content is protected Joe Calzaghe - peaked in 2006-7, aged 34-35, showing no signs of approaching 'shotness' when he retired at 36 or 37 Juan Manuel Marquez - produced superb display vs Katsidis aged 37, still active Shane Mosley - produced superb display vs Margarito aged 37, still active Vitali Klitschko - still active and still extremely dominant at 39 Wladimir Klitschko - looks to be at his peak at age 34 Glen Johnson - produced superb display vs Green aged 41, still active Tomasz Adamek - approaching the most important stage of his career at 34, showing no signs of being past his best Pongsaklek Wonjongkam - the boss of the flyweight division at age 33 Sergio Martinez - one of the best pound-for-pound fighters in the world and peaking at age 35 Steve Cunningham - IMO, the best cruiserweight in the world, aged 34 And that's the guys that are still active. There have been others, such as Nate Campbell and Lennox Lewis who have produced arguably the best performances of their careers in their mid 30s.
I agree. He's an extreme example. But the same strategy applies to all the other fighters too. Look at Vitali Klitschko now. Look at Bernard Hopkins. Holyfeld's been over-the-hill since 1994 ! And completely 'shot' since around 2001, or '02. But he was unlucky to not get the WBA title against Valuev just 2 years ago. There are so many weak spots for shot fighters to aim for, to get ranked, or to get a title. This fools SOME people into believing they are not shot at all.
I'd say that on average there are more successful old fighters today than ever before. The new generation just hasn't been able to take over.
Did things change after the "old days?" It took Foreman's comeback before you started seeing fighters in the 90s and 00s really looking good again into their 30s and 40s. What was Foreman when he started his comeback, 38 or something, and everyone laughed.
I agree that Holyfield has been over-the-hill & inconsistent since he suffered a collapsed left ventricle of the heart in '94, but I would say he's been totally shot since '00, he looked god-awful even in the first Ruiz fight.