Fitz v Langford 175lbs maximum weight

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boucher, Dec 31, 2010.


  1. Boucher

    Boucher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,596
    5
    Dec 18, 2010
    Fitz versus Sam at ,or under175lbs ,two p4p, ATG's. 15rds , modern gloves ,who do you like?
     
  2. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    i think fitz carried the weight a bit better but 175 is a decent size for langford (not the overweight, 200 pounder that came in for fights during the last quarter of his career). i think fitz cuts him up with precise shots on the way in for the first half, until langford begins closing the distance and outmuscling him in close. langford is far stronger and gets the better of the clinches, grinding him down and making way for his own shots. over 15 rounds, i see sam edging it with a knockdown or two for good measure
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    399
    Jan 22, 2010
    Who is to say about the winner of that bout ?
    But there are some opinions of fighters of that time. Sandy Ferguson a tough heavyweight who fought Jack Johnson 5 times, and most everybody else in th early 1900s
    Sparred with both men. In an interview I have ,before he passed away in 1919,he said that Fitz with his body punching, would have beat Sam Langford. For what it's worth !
     
  4. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    good to know bb:good
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,405
    9,351
    Jul 15, 2008
    A hell of a match up ... who the hell knows ...
     
  6. Boucher

    Boucher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,596
    5
    Dec 18, 2010
    No body knows, but your opinion might be interesting.
     
  7. :lol:

    i agree with him, very hard to pick. i like fitzsimmons. this guy had dynamite in his Fists