Hamed V Hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Check_Hook, Jan 4, 2011.


  1. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    Who do you think stands higher in the british ATG rankings?
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    Cracky Fatton.

    Much, much better best win, and all-round stronger top-level resume. That is all.
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Hamed left his career unfinished, whilst Hatton actually had a go and reached his potential.
     
  5. The Executioner

    The Executioner Member Full Member

    388
    1
    Jan 26, 2010
    The Prince.

    Hatton was an average fighter.
     
  6. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    Hamed was on a next level to Hatton.

    Hatton gets more fame for who knocked him out rather than for who he beat
     
  7. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    hatton has the better resume by far.... but p4p hamed would beat ricky


    hatton was the one dimetional hamed thrived off....

    weight differences aside, hamed would pacquiao hatton...(obviously not as quickly though)

    barrera beat hamed on ring smarts.. something ricky didnt possess
     
  8. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
    This.

    We going off resume or who is the better fighter?
     
  9. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    Resume, i believe resume is what determines a fighters rank, not what they could have or would have done.

    This is why id have Hatton over Hamed.

    I think Hamed had the potential to achieve so much more...but thats where it ends
     
  10. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    well resume is the only more or less objective criteria
     
  11. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
    Hatton it is then.
     
  12. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    It's actually a hard question to answer. Ricky certainly has the better win and was THE MAN at 140 before a Mr Pacquiao came along.

    Naz certainly had the ability to be great, but by the end of his career he wasn't training and had become deeply religious. Still, his wins over Kelley, Vazquez and Robinson were very good.

    I must say I prefer Naz, but Hatton just nicks it for me.
     
  13. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    Hamed. Hatton is terrible against southpaws.
     
  14. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
  15. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Its kind of bull**** when people call hatton a bum or average, he lost to the 2 best fighters of last decade. Prime hatton today would be a serious contender to unify 140 and he would knock khan out cold.