Who Was Easier To Hit During Their Peaks?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Azzer85, Dec 31, 2010.


  1. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    True, with Ali you simply couldnt catch him, with Tyson it a mixture of his head movement and also the fear of an avalanche of punches coming your way if you miss him.
     
  2. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    I loved Tyson's "make them miss, make them pay" rapid way of slipping punches & countering with timed bombs & ferocious combinations, with such insane speed it was like he was operating in 'Bullet-Time'.

    Talk about 'Nuclear Deterrent'!
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,137
    13,087
    Jan 4, 2008
    Again: Yes, his best was the two or three years before the exile. But you for some reason took his whole seven year career pre-exile into the equation which made people drag up his fight with for example Banks. Ali was a kid just starting out when he met Banks, no way was that a prime version.

    If you want to compare 86-88 Tyson against 65-67 Ali; fine. But you can't hardly make a case that Tyson against Bruno and Douglas should be excluded but that Clay's early pro fights shouldn't.
     
  4. not, the best ali was 64-67. ali 60-63 was green, and you know it.
     
  5. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Thats what i meant, the best pre exile version of Ali and 86-88 Tyson. However i thought i would generalise it and jus stick with "Rooney" Tyson and "Pre exile" Ali because i didnt think people would need dates they would know which versions im talking about

    If people cant understand Peak Pre Exile Ali and Peak Tyson under Rooney its not my fault. And im not the one that mentioned, Banks, Bruno or Douglas
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,137
    13,087
    Jan 4, 2008
    Fair enough.

    EDIT: You did mention Cooper, though.
     
  7. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    Only if you're dumb enough to ignore the role that skill plays in defence.

    Put the average guy in sparring and tell him to fight like Ali. Then watch him get beaten up. That's what I mean by a poor defence.
     
  8. IF you are hard to hit you have good defence, if you can´t understand it you are dumb for sure.
     
  9. alexvoce

    alexvoce Guest

    jabbed, ran and held like a *****.
     
  10. alexvoce

    alexvoce Guest

    all clay did was run backwards if he ever took a step forward he would have been killed.

    no wonder so hard to hit but then when against the ropes he got the **** punched out of him he had a terrific chin but its made him pay in later life.
     
  11. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    I think Tyson was easier to hit because he was coming forward, short and easier to catch

    Ali was harder to catch because he had the better legs, moved backwards (and sidewards) away from punches.

    Even though Tyson was much easier to hit, i think there isnt that much difference on how many punches they were hit with (i know im gonna get lots of crap over this)
     
  12. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Only because of the person i was replying to
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,137
    13,087
    Jan 4, 2008
    No, I think you have a point.
     
  14. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    If you can't understand the difference between defensive technique and raw ability, I recommend the General forum.
     
  15. son, i disagree but it was funny :lol: