After rewatching Pac-Marquez II and Pac-Morales I,II,III...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sandokan32, Jan 4, 2011.

  1. Sandokan32

    Sandokan32 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    975
    Likes Received:
    3
    I have to conclude that the Pac from those years was a better fighter to the WW Pac of today.
    Why? Simply because those guys (Marquez and Morales) were absolutely superior in P4P terms to all the guys Manny has faced since then. Pac showed me better footwork and punch selection in those fights. Just the fact he was facing better oposition in those bouts forced him to be more aware and tactical. He was a full time boxer, not a part congressman-part boxer like now. To me, that showed in the Margarito fight.

    Old Oscar, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey and Margarito were just bigger and heavier than those guys, nothing more. In every other aspect of the game, the Morales (yes, even the supposedly shot Morales) and Marquez are better fighters than recent Pac oponents.

    The Pac we are seing now, even tho is dominating, is a fading fighter.
     
  2. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    24
    I'm sold on that part except for Morales in the rematches, but everything else you have to convince me more of.
     
  3. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,657
    Likes Received:
    14
    His achievements then may have been greater but that does not necessarily mean he was a better fighter then. He looks a lot more rounded today but at the same time he isn't fighting better competition to test those skills.

    You say he is fading but I also think it maybe to do with his reliance on his athleticism. I sometimes feel he used to just run through guys at times below 140 which he can't do on the bigger men. He just can't employ the same tactics at this weight.
     
  4. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    30,057
    Likes Received:
    7,008
    :nutExactly correct, clottey, rito and cotto include hugton are never top tier pnd for pnd fighters. floyd, morales etcera are and the kind of fighters that will test Pac. Mosley too. Pnd for pnd analyst are rarely wrong, i give them cred except when they had pavlik right up there :nut
     
  5. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think his athleticism has faded but his ring intelligence has improved. I wish the fight with Mayweather happens already so we can know for sure. And after that he can move on and maybe test himself further either with a fight at jmw or cleaning jww.
     
  6. nastynas

    nastynas Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    5,935
    Likes Received:
    10
    I made a similar thread about a month ago.

    More so than Manny supposedly making huge improvements since his days at 126 and 130 is the fact that while he has had to deal with bigger fighters, the quality of the fighters has decreased as hes gone up in a p4p sense. JMM, Morales, MAB- these guys are first ballot hall of famers. Clottey and Margarito arent even Oscar Larios-level on a p4p scale. Whats been impressive is how he's handled the extra weight, a physical specimen as well as atg fighter.
     
  7. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    19,438
    Likes Received:
    24
    Better punch selection? Better footwork? :huh
     
  8. bambamz

    bambamz Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    pac back then was a better fighter than what he is now?

    ..
    ...


    ...
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ....
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    really?
     
  9. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    8,378
    Likes Received:
    2
    I've made this point several times on ESB.
     
  10. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Messages:
    28,924
    Likes Received:
    20
    In a few years people will look back at a flyweight that cleaned out welter, its sick.
     
  11. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,507
    Likes Received:
    30
    Not really, I have told it many times, look at the way Pacquiao fight Solis and Velasquez now compare it with his fight with much superior opponent with Cotto and Clottey, and you will see that Pacquiao did really improve.

    Nowadays Pacquiao throws certain combination that he does not do before, Pacquiao is also better at countering and has a stronger right hook. He also has a better balance and footwork.
     
  12. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    actually I think it's more of a case that he was at his peak physically. he was way faster and in a P4P sense he punched much much harder. he was fighting against guys with similar reach and who were closer in weight to him. His power at 130 and below was incredible compared to what it is today, back then a straight left was all it took to floor a guy, even if his opponents saw the punches coming they would go down.

    Still I agree with your point that skill wise, his opponents back then were much better. And that's not even dissing his opponents 140 and above.
     
  13. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    51,496
    Likes Received:
    17,075
    geez which one is it?

    Pac's competitors were old and washed up at 130 or they weren't really good fighters at 147?
     
  14. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,805
    Likes Received:
    0
    really? have you seen how wild pacman was in his first marquez and first morales fight? he only had two punches, compare that to his wide ofeensive arsenal today? then compare his performance against the tall and lanky fringe contender jorge solis to his taller opponents today, lets see if you don't see any improvements
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    :yikes

    You sir, are an idiot. No further discussion required.