Actually there's no truth behind it. it's mostly unfounded when you read his argument, which amounts to: It's all Haye's fault, and the brothers are rather spiffy cause they give me phone calls.
It's worth it just to See him and 'Ducker' on the same show. Bet the silly fat **** ain't as mouthy when they are in the same room!
i hate the man , hes just a gossip man and for that hes decent , but his articles leave alot to be desired doubt hell be as opinionated on tv , hell turn into a puppet for sky and lose even more credibility
Agreed, he busts stuff on twitter but that doesnt mean your a good journalist, just means you have good contacts. Maybe thats what makes a good journalist. Stop second guessing yourself SlapBang. No it is not what makes a good journalist.
Although I think he is a **** reporter mostly because of his biased man love for fighters. This could help Ringside bring the best out of other pundits. Hopefully they all don't just back the Brit fighter but throw some **** at the fighters Dan pleasures himself over. When is ringside back?
I think i agree with this. For a magazine style show like ringside these are the sort of guys you need, should fuel debate with Nelson and Smith. Also interesting to get a US perspective on our fighters. Out of interest, for those saying is a terrible journalist, who out there would be more suited? Ive heard Colin Hart's name mentioned, i just dont think he is suited to TV.
Surely you want some debate? Get him on. Boxing Hour on Setanta and now BBC radio is ridiculously biased in favour of Haye. Let's have a dissenting voice. Even if you think he's an idiot it's thought provoking rather than nodding dog McCrory, nodding dog Nelson and Adam ''I best think of my grandma incase I get a hardon'' Smith just agreeing with each other. Hopefully people will start to question Haye and his bull**** tactics over the years and demand more from golden bollocks instead of just the bare minimum backed up by talking smack and pretending to hate Audley, and so on.