Paulie Malignaggi

Popkins is handling you with consummate ease, same as he does all trolls with no knowledge. :good

 

Love how you defend your top four kid by calling them interchangeable.


1. Ali

2.Robinson

3. Fitzy

4. Leonard.

5. Duran

6. Tyson

7.Frazier

8. Pep

9. Ross

10.Foreman

 

sure he is, just like he calls roach a journeyman when he has never been in the ring himself

 

Who'd a thought a thread about an individual like Paulie Malignaggi could heat up so much. So much ferocity surrounding a man with a lot of heart and looks that make one think he was a reject from Jersey Shore.

The guy is technically good not great, had he had a bit more power then he would have done a bit better but surely that goes without saying. Had Duran had more hand speed he would of course been a better fighter, an increase in any sort of attribute would make you better.

 

Malignaggi is extremely over-rated, thanks to the fact he won a world title, but the guy was very much limited at world level

 

And with that, I depart. You do not understand it, but you have annihilated any credibility you could ever have, and have spared me the chore of having to expose this myself.

Good night, you utter utter embarrassing reject. :happy









Seriously - unbelievable. lol::yikes

 

haha, here are a few of my personal favourites... McClellan, Pryor, Benn, Jackson, give me your opinion on who could beat these guys in a dead cert in their own weight classes :scaredas::good:yep:huh

 

You can make a case for Tyson...maybe not Foreman...but Tyson yes.

Im not so sure why you're talking **** about his list when you have Armstrong as number one. Ask ANYONE knowledgable or otherwise who the greatest p4p was and everyone will tell you it's Sugar Ray Robinson. The rest is hearsay.

I mean Duran? Really...Leonard should've been on that list if that's the case.

 

yeah basically im a bit drunk so I made hasty list, but his was a bit of a mess, so he has no right to make fun of mine

 

Don't agree with that.

Come to think of it I don't agree with a lot of it man.

 

now now children,you both sound like a pair of school girls,please tell me your not old enough to drink brenny

 

bro drink was the main reason I had to retire :good


joking of course

 

Advice#1:

Go buy a dictionary and look up the word "interchangeable".


Advice#2:

Go onto the Classic Forum and ask people if Henry Armstrong is a valid p4p#1. You will get more people saying yes than no, and you will also get some saying Langford is the #1 and you will also get some saying Greb is the #1. Just because you have heard of Robinson but haven't heard of them doesn't mean that serious boxing historians share your view.


Advice#3:

Go onto the Classic Forum and ask people who they rank higher between Duran and SRL. The majority of those informed fans will say Duran, because he has big advantages in divisional dominance and longevity over SRL, as well as comparable prime ability at his best weight and an H2H stalemate in Leonard's division.

 

Amir Khan is a great boxer, and had every possible advantage against Paulie. He was just as fast, if not faster than Paulie. He was taller and had better reach. He had more power. He was younger. He had every advantage going into that fight, so it's hard for me to hold that against Paulie. That night showed us that Paulie is past his best and not an elite fighter, but it didn't show that he's technically flawed. I didn't watch the Hatton beatdown, but people forget how good Hatton was. It took the two greatest fighters of our generation to beat him. Where would Hatton be ranked if he hadn't fought Manny and Floyd, or had he only fought Floyd and retired after giving Paulie a beating?

 

Have you seen Hatton vs Luis Collazo? :huh

How about Hatton vs Juan Lazcano? :huh

Watch those fights, then watch Hatton vs Paulie Malignaggi, then get back to me. Be informed before making comments. :good