froch vs khan

Froch neglected his game-plan against Kessler aswell.

Why wouldn't I compare Paulie to Abraham?

Paulie came off a career win.

Abraham came off an embarassing loss (not taking anything away from Froch)

 

FOTY? Are we not counting Dominic Vea-Oscar Siale?

 

Kessler > Maidana

Because Abraham's a much better fighter. Don't forget that AA was favourite going into the fight.

Says a lot really.

Not all that embarrassing. A lot of people on here would tell you that it's Dirrell that should feel embarrassed.

 

No, because it's not high profile enough...

 

****ing hell Laz, using green ink? Its the first sign of impending mental illness.:deal

 

the thing that made the khan fight exciting is his glass jaw, without that it would be just a very good fight, nothing wrong with that by the way:good

 

Riiiiight....

 

:good

 

Froch.

 

I'm not saying it's something we should give Carl credit for. I'm just not going to be critical of him for losing to a fighter like Kessler in his back yard.

Of course he is. That's just AA's style, it's not that he wasn't trying. Fact of the matter is, Paulie was taylor made for Khan and was never going to be a threat.

I wouldn't be bragging about beating a past best Diaz while completely ignoring the fact he has been destroyed twice previously.

Schooled horribly? Maybe if Dirrell could stay on his feet long enough.

Why are you saying about it being FOTY? Where have I disputed that? and what has it got to do with this?

 

Because this is about FOTY? :huh The Thread?

 

Froch by a country mile (whatever the fck that is)

 

FightER of the year, not fight of the year.

 

That's what I'm saying.

Saying FOTY can still stand at Fighter of the year, and that's what I meant.