To begin with all they said is that Billy should apologisefor his original post which I think he should have done. If he hadn't wanted to get an intire forum of fans involved then he shouldn't have posted his imflamatory comments on here. Trust me I find some of the posters (naming no names) as teadious as the next man but in this case I think he brought it on himself and probably should have just taken it on the chin!!!
He gave Groves kudos for apologising. I think we can agree to disagree on whether he should have apologised to Groves for pointing out the inflamatory remarks in the article.
Phoning him up would have been pointing out. Posting a thread bashing Groves on a website when he had none of the facts was inflamatory!!!
All the belts are only as good as the fighter who holds them regardless of which one. As for the comments made by George the only people who know what was said are GG and the interviewer so none of us can claim to know the facts and as for Billy's comment about never having boxed it looked to me he was only replying to a troll at the level the troll would understand and probably couldnt be bothered trying to have a reasonable debate with someone who has repeatedly shown us that debating is outside their skillset.
Well Lee 10,000 fans that paid to watch Ricky Hatton time and time again must of thought it was something to go and support the man?