Wich alphabet org, do you take the MOST serious?

None

 

WBO\RING Magazine

 

IBF
They aren't perfect (Stripping Devon was foolish) but they keep to 1 title per division

 

IBO - although its not recognised it only gives its belt to the top guy in each division (I think) and they have to go through certain criteria to be awarded this.

I only picked this because all the alphabet orgs are useless

The ring belts probablys the best all round belt

The WBC looks the best

 

IBO current champions include:
Isaac Chilemba (168)
Peter Manfredo Jr. (160)
Zauerbek Baysangurov (154)
Gideon Buthelezi (105)

and of course Danny Green at Cruiser....

 

The Ring or IBF.

 

Could you explain why?

 

That's not an alfabet organization though.... but it's the most credible title i agree 100%

By the way, after reading that the WBC has crowned Sebastian Zbik as the 'undiputed WBC champion', named Martinez the 'emeritus champion' and announced that their 'silver belt' will be on the line for Martinez-Dzindziruk, allow me to express the sentiment that i personally feel that anybody even remotely involved with the policy of the World Boxing Council should be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and spend the rest of their days in a cell with a 350-pound serial ******. Or maybe with Ike Ibeabuchi?

 

You do know the WBA was around a few years before the WBC right?

I voted IBF, its the only body that encourages unification in its rules, altho they do have a bad habbit of stripping title holders. (Still the best of a bad bunch)

 

WBF 4 life

 

The WBC is more legit cause it has the toughest fighters and it is more worldly recognized.

 

oh well, guess they are all crap then

 

I also agree that there rankings are bullshhittt.

Since, Oscar owns the RING, its rankings are manipulated, cause Oscar is a corrupt person.

 

Wbc