Wich alphabet org, do you take the MOST serious?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Robney, Jan 18, 2011.


Page 3 of 4
  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    How the **** do any of you take ANY of them serious with all the bull**** they pull?
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Jan 18, 2011
    Lance_Uppercut, Jan 18, 2011
    #31
  2. MJK

    MJK Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,688
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    Far from perfect, but the most consistent one with their rules from what I saw is the IBF. They dont have ultra champion, mega champion, cool champion, chilly bling bling champion, etc.
     
    MJK, Jan 18, 2011
    MJK, Jan 18, 2011
    #32
  3. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007

    This
     
    Little Pea, Jan 18, 2011
    Little Pea, Jan 18, 2011
    #33
  4. Edward

    Edward Active Member Full Member

    698
    1
    Oct 28, 2009
    I thought that the WBA pre-dates the WBC, I could be wrong...
     
    Edward, Jan 18, 2011
    Edward, Jan 18, 2011
    #34
  5. chilost

    chilost New Member Full Member

    47
    0
    Oct 12, 2006
    IBF for the simple fact that they KEEP 1 champ per division.

    WBC
    Emertius
    WBC (Full)
    WBC (Interm)
    WBC (Silver, which is to replace interm but they still have interm champs)
    WBC Diamond.
    WBC "in Recess" Champ (Rojas in the FW division)3
    = 6 champs per division

    WBA
    WBA Super
    WBA Regular
    WBA Interm
    WBA "In recess"
    = 4 champs per division

    WBO
    WBO SUPER
    WBO (full)
    WBO Interm
    = 3 champs per division


    IBF
    IBF (FULL)
    = 1 champ per division

    **** i have even seen a Interm IBO champ. They only thing the IBF does fuk'd up is strip their champs for BS mandos.

    not hard to see who be on bUUUULLLLLLLLSHSHHHHHHHHH with their titles.
     
    chilost, Jan 18, 2011
    chilost, Jan 18, 2011
    #35
  6. Aztecas

    Aztecas Guest

    Thats why the WBC gets more recognition worldwide, cause they show their WBC titles more than any other organization.

    The IBF hardly gets any recognition now a days, cause they're trying to keep things simple.

    What's bad for boxing, is good for business
    Whats good for boxing, is bad for business.

    Its a give-n-take situation.:-(
     
    Aztecas, Jan 18, 2011
    Aztecas, Jan 18, 2011
    #36
  7. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    Exactly. WTF is wrong with you people?
     
    RSBonos, Jan 18, 2011
    RSBonos, Jan 18, 2011
    #37
  8. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    Atlanta, Jan 18, 2011
    Atlanta, Jan 18, 2011
    #38
  9. Kissan

    Kissan I respect box Full Member

    1,353
    221
    Mar 1, 2010
    look at his ava. bias to the fullest
     
    Kissan, Jan 18, 2011
    Kissan, Jan 18, 2011
    #39
  10. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    IBF is the least crap, in my opinion, but I favor the Ring over them too.
     
    Steenalized, Jan 18, 2011
    Steenalized, Jan 18, 2011
    #40
  11. Contendo

    Contendo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,036
    1
    Mar 13, 2009
    IBF -

    Positive - No 'Interim' belt holders
    Positive - No 'Silver' belt holders
    Positive - No 'Regular / Super' belt holders
    Positive - No 'Diamond' / 'Emeritus' / 'In Recess' belt holders

    Have to face Top 15 rated fighter to gain No.1 mandatory challenger position.

    Voluntary defences have to be against Top 15 rated fighter.

    Enforce a mandatory once every 9 months, otherwise stripped of title (and has been done)

    Good enough for me! :good
     
    Contendo, Jan 18, 2011
    Contendo, Jan 18, 2011
    #41
  12. MrSillery

    MrSillery Member Full Member

    162
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    1 title per division : IBF
     
    MrSillery, Jan 18, 2011
    MrSillery, Jan 18, 2011
    #42
  13. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,926
    Jan 18, 2010
    :bump
     
    Robney, Jan 19, 2011
    Robney, Jan 19, 2011
    #43
  14. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,058
    27,721
    Jul 26, 2004
    None...

    That being said, I hold the Ring Champion in higher regard in most cases. Ya they have their problems too but I find them to be the best of the bunch personally.
     
    kirk, Jan 19, 2011
    kirk, Jan 19, 2011
    #44
  15. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    WBC has the history but now it also has to all silly joke titles.

    Cliche but true - the fighter makes the belt not the other way around.
     
    Big Left, Jan 20, 2011
    Big Left, Jan 20, 2011
    #45
Page 3 of 4