Breaking news: Klitschko-Adamek appears to be a go

Read again and see what i'm trying to say

"stop using boxrec and actually watch fights"

You're just being silly now. It isn't a choice between one fight with cunningham or a stay at heavyweight! Look at his opponents at heavy: golota will have been a significant domestic fight so ok. Estrada was a good gatekeeper. Arreola was a fantastic victory.

But grant or maddalone are unnecessary. He could have rematched uss and still had success at heavyweight!

 

What does this thread have to do with haye?

Adamek is a highly ranked deserving challenger. But wlad is far too good to lose to a former lightheavyweight.

I don't see adamek's chin holding up to a wlad straight right, do you?

 

where did i say i didn't watch that fight, i used boxrec to point out your incredible opinion that uss should have won this fight, and he put uss 3 x down, uss had problems with troy ross lately, so claimin that the rematch would be more interesting then the first one is just weird... the bigger challenge waits for him in HW but i'm not gonna continue this irrelevant discussion anyomore..

 

Nah, You didnt understand me. I only suggested that you could have scored for Arreola since you scored for Cunningham and both were biased split decisions. It's beyond me how anybody could score those fights not for Adamek but I've read some users here proving me wrong. Actually, there r ppl who saw Arreolas dominance in parallel with Adamek being hurt in this bout or just gifted decision for Adamek vs Cunn (who cares Adamek was nobody at that time, was fighting in Cunn homeland and whats more had a foe in Don King).

(I've watched both fights multiple times since im Adameks biased fan and it always makes me laugh when some 'experts' say Adamek got hurt with Arreola or got 3 lucky KD's - Ive analysed those bouts precisely enough to know its pure bullcrap)

 

Both Arreola and Cunningham were Adamek clear victories and if somebody says otherwise he has problem with scoring fiths IMO. However the fight with Cunningham was much closer than the fight with Cris. As much as I watch fight, if there fight two opponents and both have good promotors it is very often that 1 judge is biased in one fighter, seconed judge in the second fighter and only one judge is neutral. That was exactly in the fight with Cunningham, where only one judge scored the fight properly (115:112 Adamek). Scores like 116:110 Adamek and 114:112 Cunningham were scored by corrupted judges.

 

Just stop using boxrec, it doesn't tell the full story.

You wouldn't find the rematch interesting? Did you not watch the first fight? Easily a foty candidate, it was superb!

 

12 rounds of boxing was enough to show who's better. USS had his chance and he blew it. I would watch the fight but for adamek who has no more than 2 or 3 years until he retires it's just a waste of time.

 

In the areola fight adamek clearly won a close fight. There was enough to suggest a more motivated arreola could give adamek problems in a rematch but only due to power and size.

Vs cunningham I think it is fair to say cunningham was clearly the superior technical boxer and bar the knockdowns he would have won a clear decision. Credit to adamek tho, that round when cunningham was laying a beating on adamek and looking like he'd score a 10-8 round himself and tomasz pulled out a flash knockdown, great stuff that was. I think anyone saying adamek is a clear winner has to be biased and consequently scored all close rounds to adamek. A rematch was well warranted imo.

It's hard to say adamek deserved the victory.

 

Its embarrassing - the guy who scored 3 KD's and pushed forward whole night long u say doesnt deserve the vicotry, just give it up. Oh, and once more - you say 3 lucky KD's saved Adameks ass, I say there could've been 12 KD's...

 

I never said lucky. I said flash, as in from nowhere. I said it was great. I think it was one of adameks most significant fights.

We clearly disagree and will never know how a rematch would have gone so it's pointless.

Back to current affairs, I think adamek has more chance vs vitali than vs wlad. Thoughts?

 

agreed. Adamek should fight Vitali.

 

i hope for good competetive show but cant rly see Adamek winning.

 

funny how you say "every stupid demand from the Klitschko".... im sure you think every demand from Haye is right on point and common......:roll:

 

Man everyone bitching about the KO bro's "Demands" needs to look at it like this:

Think of KO opponents as prospective people to hire for a job, and KO bro's are the people that hire you. If you are looking to get hired somewhere (I.E. make a nice chunk of money, and get a title shot against a KO bro) you shouldn't be bitching too much about you're hours (ring size, rematch clause, etc, just be ****ing happy youre getting a title shot and some $$$$).

Does that make any sense :smoke?

 

Personally, if I was wlad I wouldn't accept a penny less than 66% vs anyone.