Wlad Klitschko vs Lennox Lewis Resume

Sure, Wlad had every reason to fear Chisora.................:rofl Which is why he rescheduled to fight him. You make no sense at all.

 

Calvin Brock is not Wlad's best win. :nono Still a good win against an undefeated skilled puncher/boxer but not Wlad's best by a long shot.

 

Look you stuck up little *****, I'm done with being ignored. I know I could never be half the man Wlad is...but goddammit I can try can't I? Wlad is gone, its time to move on!!! I'm here before you, just give me a fraction of the devotion you show him and I will die a happy man.

 

You can't even attempt to debate me about boxing because it's clear judging by your posts that you create attributes that you desire, but historically and even physically don't exist.

You're probably going to tell me Chagaev and Chambers who use no lateral movement and neglected to move their head while standing at Wlad's punching range were better than Brock, but you have no basis for your argument.

And I'm sure you're going to make Wlad out as a aggressive infighter that throws uppercits as early as the first round when evidence to the contrary exists where multiple times and as recently as his last fight he had multiple opportunities, but failed to do so. And in the later rounds when he did, it was often with clownish innaccuracy. Even the uppercut that finished a finished Peter was ugly and desperate looking.

 

It is hard to judge as Wlad has never fought anywhere near the level of fighters Lewis has faced.

I think you have to go pretty deep into Lewis' resume to fight someone as bad as Peter (one of Wlad's best wins).

 

Why dont you use your effort to explaining why wlad(In your opinion) is so much better than razor and would beat him easily?

That doesnt make sense at all...

 

De Nile is not a river in Egypt.

 

The woman I'm with now would emasculate you and make you contemplate suicide. She would actually tell you the truth which I'm sure is something you're not used to hearing. And then when you get mad, she would call you out for the ***** you are.

 

Which doesn't take into account...

[url]http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/field/hair.html[/url]

There is NO way to determine the original color of 4000 year old hair.

 

Your "scientific evidence" does not exist...

 

That is not what the article was saying. Nice straw man attempt though, I'll give you credit for trying this time.

They've even determined the probable hair color of ancient neanderthals.

[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3311826/DNA-reveals-some-Neanderthals-were-ginger.html[/url]

 

Poetry baby. How I love you.

 

Ok, then maybe, with all of your grand intellect, you can tell me the EXACT meaning of the aricle I cited. I'll quote it for you again.

Have at it...

 

Its not saying its impossible, but pointing out common pitfalls and encouraging further analysis. Many mummies were mistaken to be natural blondes and reds, but Ramses II was not one of them. These types of things were took into consideration during the testing. They also determined his hair was cymotrich.


Professor P. F. Ceccaldi, with a research team, studied some hairs from the mummy's scalp. Ramesses II was 87 years-old when he died, and his hair had turned white. Ceccaldi determined that the reddish-yellow color of the hair was due to a dye with a dilute henna solution. As we saw earlier, many Egyptians dyed their hair, and this personal habit was preserved by the embalmers. However, traces of the hair's original color remained in the roots. Microscopic examinations showed that the hair roots contained natural red pigments, and that therefore, during his younger days, Ramesses II had been a red head. Analysis concluded that these red pigments did not result from the hair somehow fading, or otherwise being altered after death, but did represent Ramesses' natural hair color. Ceccaldi also studied the cross-section of the hairs, and determined from their oval shape, that Ramesses had been "cymotrich" (wavy-haired). Finally, he stated that such a combination of features showed that Ramesses had been a "leucoderm" (white-skinned person). Refer to the above report.
Balout and the other forensic specialists were under no illusions as to the significance of this discovery. They concluded:

"After having achieved ths immense work, an important scientific conclusion remains to be drawn: the anthropological study and the microscopic analysis of hair, carried out by four laboratories: Judiciary Medecine (Professor Ceccaldi), Société L'Oréal, Atomic Energy Commission, and Institut Textile de France showed that Ramses II was a 'leucoderm', that is a fair-skinned man, near to the Prehistoric and Antiquity Mediterranean's, or briefly, of the Berber of Africa." ​

The fact of red-headed Egyptians has not only anthropological interest however, but also great symbolic importance. In ancient Egypt, the god Seth was said to have been red-haired, and redheads were claimed to have worshipped the god devoutly. See G. A. Wainwright, The Sky-Religion in Egypt: Its Antiquity and Effects, Cambridge University Press, 1938, pgs 31, 33, 53.In the Ramesses study by the French, the Egyptologist Desroches-Noblecourt discussed the importance of Ramesses' rufous condition. She noted that the Ramessides (the family of Ramesses II), were devoted to Seth, with several bearing the name Seti, which means "beloved of Seth". She concluded that the Ramessides believed themselves to be divine descendants of Seth, with their red hair as proof of their lineage. She speculated that Ramesses II may have been descended from a long line of redheads. ​

​