Do people think Bader is that much of a better wrestler than Hammil?? Because I saw Jones ragdoll Hammil.
I have not been impressed by Bader at all whenever I've seen him. I'm backing Jones for a horrific 1st round KO.
No need for Bader bashing. He is a good talented unbeaten fighter. But JJ is special IMO. a few years down the line this could have been a mega fight if the UFC had kept them apart a bit longer, but no complaints about them sticking in young, hungry and dangerous guys together. JJ TKO R1
Bader is powerful. He might be able to take Jones downa nd he might be able to stand with him due to power.
Jones Smashed Vladdy too. Vlad doesnt have the name recognition as Lil Nog but the are the same level of fighter.
Eh not really. They are 1-1 but Nog smashed him up last time out. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVqGOt92PWU[/ame]
I think people should give Bader credit for taking the Jones fight, nobody wanted to fight Jones and Bader stepped up up. Jones has been a wrecking ball and his potentional seems unlimited but Bader might be a guy that can get Jones off his feet, should be a great fight.
DIII all american vs a DI all american. I think most people would consider Bader to be a much better pure wrestler than Hamill. What that means in MMA, who knows?
I like Hammill the person but I think Hamill the fighter is rubbish. He is a relatively strong and powerful wrestler. Same as Bader who I also think leaves ALOT to be desired technically. BUT I think BAder is a bigger, stronger, more powerful version of Hammill. Hammill is improving but just not at a fast enough pace.
I was under the impression that Hamill was one of the best wrestlers in MMA being that he was in the Olympics and all. Guess I was way off.