What makes Bradley, Alexander & Berto "slicker" than someone like Pac victim M.Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jan 30, 2011.


Page 2 of 3
  1. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    I'm sorry, what are you talking about?
     
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    #16
  2. StrawberrySam

    StrawberrySam Member Full Member

    462
    0
    Oct 7, 2010
    when a fighter is drained, his full potential is not reach
     
    StrawberrySam, Jan 30, 2011
    StrawberrySam, Jan 30, 2011
    #17
  3. Ayes

    Ayes New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    This content is protected
     
    Ayes, Jan 30, 2011
    Ayes, Jan 30, 2011
    #18
  4. Chunk

    Chunk tallaght boy Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Oct 14, 2007
    He has no idea! Hes just programmed to slag off mayweather at random intervals its not his fault its biological
     
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    #19
  5. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Oh, he's a *******? :patsch

    I was wondering were his little outburst came from.
     
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    #20
  6. Chunk

    Chunk tallaght boy Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Oct 14, 2007
    Must be mate! Otherwise he would have just said he feels slick describes a fighter like mayweather instead of all that ***** bull****!
     
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    #21
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    Eh? :huh Why would stating a fact help me sleep at night? I think you should bow out here.
     
    horst, Jan 30, 2011
    horst, Jan 30, 2011
    #22
  8. dvb

    dvb Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,826
    1
    Mar 16, 2010
    bradley alexander and berto are not slick,they are not defensive masters,they are quite easy to land clean punches on a regular basis.

    floyd,pac,martinez,cotto,and possibly marqeuz also would destroy all 3 and show them who the legend is and who the over rated fighter is.
     
    dvb, Jan 30, 2011
    dvb, Jan 30, 2011
    #23
  9. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    I'm just saying, that adding Pacquiao 'victim' was not really necessary at all. I don't mean to pollute your thread with pointless arguing, but I don't really see what the need for it was. We know that Pacquiao beat Cotto. You could have simply put 'What makes Bradley, Alexander & Berto ''slicker'' than Cotto'. I don't see why the addition at the end was entirely necessary.

    But, whatever. It's your choice :good
     
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    #24
  10. Chunk

    Chunk tallaght boy Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Oct 14, 2007
    I would agree! You would think after all cotto has done in his career he would deserve more than be labeled a 'victim'
     
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    Chunk, Jan 30, 2011
    #25
  11. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Who was saying Bradley & Alexander are especially slick?
     
    Gneus7, Jan 30, 2011
    Gneus7, Jan 30, 2011
    #26
  12. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006
    Slick boxers are counterpunchers which Pac and Top Prank have been avoiding for years now. Stationary and slow fighters have been there meal tickets.
     
    fighter86, Jan 30, 2011
    fighter86, Jan 30, 2011
    #27
  13. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Ummm.....what?

    I just think it's totally unnecessary to call Cotto a Pac victim. That's just my opinion, which is completely reasonable.

    Who cares what Hopkins says? He thinks Australia is in Europe for ****s sake :lol:

    And I'm not obsessed with Pac at all, Linus. I think you've confused me with someone else there.
     
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    #28
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    This really isn't difficult to understand: :dead


    - Many people on this forum think Pac fears "slick black" fighters such as Bradley, Alexander and Berto

    - I don't think those guys are any slicker than Miguel Cotto

    - Pacquiao has already beaten Cotto with ease

    - Therefore, why would he fear Bradley, Alexander or Berto?


    Thus, it is necessary to reference Pac's defeat of Cotto so that mentioning Cotto is relevant within the thread.

    And is there a more concise way of saying "...Cotto, who Pac has already beaten with ease" so that the title of the thread fits within the allotted space? :huh

    Yes: "Pac victim M.Cotto"! :happy


    Now, go and scrub hard to get all the sand out of your vagina, 'Desert Storm'. :lol:
     
    horst, Jan 30, 2011
    horst, Jan 30, 2011
    #29
  15. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Quite an immature response. I didn't expect this from you Popkins.

    I wasn't even mentioning Timothy Bradley in this discussion.

    You know mate, you become more like the posters you 'despise' with each thread.
     
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    SportsLeader, Jan 30, 2011
    #30
Page 2 of 3