Who ranks higher, Hagler or Hopkins

I suppose that is reasonable. He could maybe win a split decision if the fight was held in America, but I stand by my original prediction. The athletes I listed have better ring intelligence, footspeed, handspeed, athletic ability, and heart than Hopkins.

 

deal:deal

Excellent. Almost SPOT ON. Its easy to look good against domestic American opponents. I guarantee that if Hopkins relocated to an European territory, and fought the calibre of opponents on my list, he would be a mere journeyman/gatekeeper at this point. He is well-preserved due to the weak level of opposition he's been facing.

 

Regional grade athletes are defined as subpar athletes from the US, Canada, and Latin America. Who are you to tell us what American-level means?

 

Hopkins. What he is doing at his age is legendary.

 

You stupid ****ing cocksucker.Just where the **** did I ever write "American-level"?And just where did I mention it referring to any athletes?Nice job,knucklehead:goodNice wind up attempt

 

You are one of the most insolent posters I have ever encountered on this website. You will either address me respectfully, or not address me at all. Why would you even reply to my post if you think it is a wind-up attempt. When you are ready to discuss boxing, I will acknolwegde you. You obviosuly have no boxing knowledge so I will dismiss you like the insignificant maggot that you are. :hi:

 

Herb,don't go.We have so much more to discuss.Btw,good winding up!And that's MISTER insignificant maggot to the likes of you,bub:hi.S,it's ACKNOWLEDGE and OBVIOUSLY,you silly one,you.

 

Fine. But I maintain that my posts are serious. My input is from the heart.

 

No matter how silly they may be?

 

Hagler.

A better fighter in his prime.

 

I have over a 1000 posts. I would not describe any of them as silly. My posts are well-supported and thoroughly reserached. Few people on this website can dispute my rock solid arguments and findings.

 

Those statements alone are silly.Btw,it's "researched".

 

At MW, it's not open to debate.


But overall, it's very close.


All things considered, Hagler.

 

So, you count Erdei's fights vs Garay against him, despite the fact that he won? You can have problems with a fighter on any given night, like Hagler with Munroe, Mugabi and Antuofermo and like Hopkins had with Mercado. And Garay is a fairly decent fighter also, so I dont understand your point, or, more to the point, your point doesn't hold any weight.

 

Hagler at mw, Hopkins p4p. That´s an easy one.