Do you view a Lewis vs. Rahman rematch was necessary

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011.


Page 2 of 12
  1. freelaw

    freelaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,143
    916
    Nov 17, 2007
    :lol::good
     
    freelaw, Feb 4, 2011
    freelaw, Feb 4, 2011
    #16
  2. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Call me crazy..but I think Lennox "Nasty Black" Lewis wanted to quit before the knockout. When Rahman started tagging him, he ran to the ropes like "I don't want any part of this." The smile was clearly a nervous reaction when he realized he couldn't make it out of the ropes in time..like people who are scared to death are sometimes found with smiles on their faces. He has no balls.

    Lewis is a known quitter, remember when he pretended not to understand the count in the McCall fight? Than he threw a big fit to save face. :yep
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #17
  3. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Are you ******ed? How do you conclude that I am a Lewis nuthugger? What an odd and completely untrue statement with no evidence to back up.

    Nasty Black? Muslim Black? I think you better be quiet before you start saying things you will regret. Stop acting so pathetic and move on.
     
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    #18
  4. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Rahman KO 5! I don't need evidence when you have your hands all over his hairless tiny nuts.

    I will be quite...quite happy to tell you that Nasty Black is a quitter. He ran like a ***** and got slapped in the face. I don't even think he was knocked out, he was pretending because he wanted no part of Muslim Black.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #19
  5. the_baller

    the_baller Guest


    Is this a cry for attention?:-(


    *****!:twisted:
     
    the_baller, Feb 4, 2011
    the_baller, Feb 4, 2011
    #20
  6. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Troll.

    What are you, like 12 years old or something? You are on a boxing forum, not in the playground. This puerile, childish trolling is like something you would expect from an infant. Act civilised, be treated in a civilised manned. Troll, and no-one will take you seriously. Just a word of advice.
     
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    #21
  7. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009

    Rahman KO 5, nuthugger.

    Why don't you stick to the topic and answer the question? You can't, can you? Cause you are choking on Lennox "Nasty Black" Lewis' tiny, hairless egg like nuts.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #22
  8. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Answer the question, nuthugger? And you call me a troll.

    A rematch was not necessary, Rahman has the right to retire with his legacy.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #23
  9. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    Threetime no1, Feb 4, 2011
    Threetime no1, Feb 4, 2011
    #24
  10. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009

    If Rahman didn't land a massive right hand, Lewis woudn't have been KOed

    If Rahman didn't throw the punch, it wouldn't land, and Lewis wouldn't get KOed

    :deal     Rahman's win was decisive, no rematch necessary.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #25
  11. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I don't care what happened after Rahman lost his desire. Answer the question, nuthugger?

    Rahman KO5.. Lewis lost fair and square. A rematch is not necessary.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #26
  12. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    What????:scaredas: they had a rematch clause???
    but acording to Haye/Lewis fans rematch clause = slave contract!
    ho wait, that's only for the Klitschko's contracts:lol:.....
     
    Bubby, Feb 4, 2011
    Bubby, Feb 4, 2011
    #27
  13. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Lewis was the champion. When the champion loses, particularly in an upset, he is rightfully given the chance to compete again for his belt. That is the way it works? If Chisora beat Wladimir, then does Chisora have every right to retire with his legacy and not rematch Wlad? By your admissions, of course he does. For some reason I am sure if Chisora did that, you would heavily criticise him instead of supporting his cause like you do here with this hypothetical Rahman scenario.

    Vitali Klitschko was a stand in for Kirk Johnson, he was the challenger, in fact, he was the second choice challenger. When the champion loses, he deserves to fight for his title back. When the challenger loses, he fights his way back into contention. It is obviously more difficult for a challenger who is a late replacement, and therefore not supposed to be fighting for a title, to get another shot. That is just the way it works.

    Lewis was old, unmotivated, and struggling with weight issues. When a champion reaches a stage where they are struggling with challengers and losing rounds, it's time for them to hang it up. Lewis sensed he was slipping after struggling with Klitschko, so rightfully decided to hand em' up. I'm sure when Vitali reaches this stage, he will quit without hesitation aswell.

    Did Vitali deserve a rematch? Probably. Is there any issue with a late substitute for Kirk Johnson, who lost by TKO and was cut to pieces not getting a second shot against an aging, overweight champion? Absolutely not.
     
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    SportsLeader, Feb 4, 2011
    #28
  14. Noam Chomsky

    Noam Chomsky A Source of Emulation Full Member

    916
    0
    Nov 27, 2010
    Rahman is an idiot, he should have faked a shoulder injury in the second fight and gotten out of it before the knockout, and then gotten his brother to face Lennox.
     
    Noam Chomsky, Feb 4, 2011
    Noam Chomsky, Feb 4, 2011
    #29
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Indeed, someone is using their brain.

    Lewis enslaved Rahman. Despite Rahman proving he was the better man by knocking Nasty Black out cold, he was wrongfully forced into an unnecessary fight after losing his desire. Rahman wanted his legacy, he wanted to knockout Tyson for the right money, and retire with a win. But Lewis enslaved hiim.
     
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011
    #30
Page 2 of 12