Klitschko Contracts

Hmm.. Could Rahman (just for an example) fought someone else between rematching Lennox or Byrd fought without belt on the line before fighting Wlad?

How was it even possible to have rematch clause to mandatory without Byrd agreeing in to it?

 

You are going to have to try harder than that son.

Your case for David Tua just wont float.

The fact does remain though..the Haye ship is sinking fast and you are trying to take the Klits down with it.

My final thought...suck's to be you.

 

Not at all. I have no problem with the Klitschko's dominating, as long as they give the fights fans want, and deserve, to see.

That's the real difference between us. I'm a Klitschko fan, you're a Klitschko fan. I don't defend them offering bad contracts, you do.

You can talk about Haye or whoever you want, but that's the underlining issue between us. I'm primarily a boxing fan, you're a Klitschko fan. I don't have a huge problem with that, but you should understand that the Klitschko's offering poor contracts hurts boxing.

 

I'm just going by what Byrd said in that interview.

This is what he said:

 

Im more than willing to bet i been watching this sport well before you.Was a time in the not to distant past where there were no Eastern Europeans in this sport....didnt stop me from being a Boxing fan!

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=287411

get in on that action jack..make your case.

 

Solis has no problem to sign the rematch clause for Wlad. He wants to fight and sign, just simple.


A Heavyweight who wants to get the most money, fight a Klitschko.

 

It seems to me that the only people who drink this haterade about the contracts are deluded Haye fans.

When 95% of the people who go on and on about this crap are from the same little country... when those people are also always defending David Haye.... well the credibility is somewhat less than zero.

What is funny is that these people throw away their integrity, and become willfully deceitful, to protect a fighter that treats them with no respect whatsoever.

Some people go out of their way to be used and abused. Those people have no self-esteem. Which is ultimately why these posts about how bad the Klit contracts are will almost always come from a self-loathing Brit.

Sure, it stinks up the forum. Sure, it makes for shitty and frustrating reading. But think for a second. As bad as it may be to have to read through their crap, how much better is it than it would be actually being one of those self-loathing Haye fans?

Could there be a worse fate? So perhaps it is our pity that is needed instead.

 

Holy **** balls, almost threw up laughing. That's funny . Your trying so hard. I can appreciate the effort.

Barret just came to draw with him and knocked him down. Plus that would be just another example for Klitschko haters to use for beating past opponents of Lewis that are older. What a joke. If Tua was rated or for all these years he'd have worked his way into a mandatory shot already.

 

Last time I looked the champion was the one who dictates the terms , Not the challengers, who should be happy just to be able to get a shot at the title.

I haven't read the rest of all your post, but have you come up with a better name then Tua yet.

 

Tua is a prime example. Sure, he'd stand little chance but is he a better fighter than Sosnowski? Yes. Did Sosnowski deserve twice as much? No.

My only point, is that it was an unfair offer. I'm not saying a Tua bout was great, because it wouldn't have been, but it doesn't mean it wasn't unfair.

 

Last time I checked the reason Tua turned down the offer and only reason he's still boxing is money problems. It wasn't the rematch clauses. He figured if he took the couple hundred K and lost right away he'd been done, so why not take a couple cheaper easier fights making 5 digits and then get the finale big pay day. If he lost to Klitschko right away he's e basically done. And please; people have a field day with Rahman and Briggs( past Lewis opponents) vs the brothers, what makes Tua so great that he won't get the Bothers more grief.

Had Tua had enough belief in himself that he could win the fight he'd have taken it . Knowing full well that his next fights as champion would make him enough money, But he like Haye knew better

 

Just like he did a washed up Barrett

 

didn't Wlad just knock out a black version of Tua in Sam Peter. Short stocky, thick neck, wide hooks, sound familiar except Peter once was a champion

 

Seriously, don't bother replying. Just feel pity instead.

People who go out of their way to defend Haye are by definition also people who hate themselves.
There must be a higher than 95% correlation with people who defend Haye and those who ***** about the Klit contracts. Can you imagine being so ****ed up?

Feel pity indeed.