Yes, it is a real "schooling" when you say you rate a win and I say I don't rate it. Vicious. PS: Have a look back through this thread and see how many people have ridiculed your stupidity. Enjoy.
p4p i mean... http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_Pound_For_Pound--1990s
I do enjoy these posts as they give me something to reffer to when I correctly predict boxing results. You see where you are so wrong is that a fantasy match that isnt going to happen isnt a schooling atsch and cannot be proven. To see how correct I have been when picking results against the grain just check some of the old threads http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=250453 On this thread the predictions have come rolling in http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=271001 Once again, read what was said before the fight happend http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=246735 Once again, read what was said before the fight happend All very similar to this thread. Now lets see your pre fight THREAD predictions rather than a post on someone elses thread. Now thats a schooling :smoke
atsch Can you read? Toney was p4p#3 at the end of 1993 (open your eyes)... He fought Jones in November 1994 and was soundly beaten... That's why he wasn't listed by the end of 1994... And he had risen to p4p#2 by the time he fought Jones courtesy of KO wins over Tim Littles and Prince Charles Williams in 1994, which coincided with Julio Cesar Chavez losing to Frankie Randall in January 1994... My main question to you is: Why did you start making these comments, when you patently know NOTHING about boxing at that time or the career of James Toney? :huh
Talk about desperation!! Digging up old fight predictions which have nothing to do with anything, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the fact you are getting RIDICULED by every second poster for your stupidity, and absolutely owned in the poll. Fun times :smoke
I showed you prediction threads that were against the grain, and you couldnt show any in return . You are known for being a ducker Popkins, but im now experiencing it first hand, and big time do you duck questions . Weak
You post this while you are ducking lower than prime Pernell Whitaker on another thread where you are being called to explain your rubbish logic regarding the rating of wins. I have no interest whatsoever in spending 20minutes digging back through old posts, looking for predictions I have made. It could take even longer than that using the search facility on this website. Instead, I will continue to embarrass you like I have been doing all afternoon. Score check from this poll anyone? :smoke Idiot.
That says it all about you really. You don't even have the brain to be embarrassed, when 58 out of 59 people are embarrassed for you. :smoke
Why not, Kessler is fast and presses his opponents to the ropes, Jones has a glasscheen but hard to hit. 60/40 for Jones, Kessler wouldn't lose by KO at least imo.